Department of Clinical Neurophysiology, Kuopio University Hospital, Kuopio, Finland.
J Neurosci Methods. 2013 Jul 15;217(1-2):75-81. doi: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2013.04.019. Epub 2013 May 6.
Cortical silent period (cSP) is a short interruption in electromyography (EMG) during active muscle contraction induced with transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS). The cSP is a measure of cortical inhibition and is believed to represent inhibitory interneuron effects on excited motor cortical areas. Several pathological conditions and pharmacological manipulations induce changes to cSP duration indicating alterations in intracortical inhibition. At present, it is common to manually analyse the cSP duration from measured EMG. However, to avoid inter-examiner effects on cSP interpretation and detection, as well as to allow for quick measurement online, automated routine would be preferable. In this study, we evaluate the feasibility of a straight-forward cSP detection routine based on analysing the rectified first derivative of the EMG signal following TMS. Previously measured cSPs of 54 healthy subjects were reanalysed manually by two of the authors and using the automated routine. Furthermore, we recruited one subject for whom the cSPs were induced with several stimulation intensities, and those cSPs were analysed manually by two of the authors as well as using the automated routine. We found that cSPs were detected correctly by the automated cSP detection routine, and agreement with manually analysed subject-specific mean cSPs was excellent (ICC=0.992, p<0.001). The inter-examiner variability was similar to the variability between manual and automated analysis. Hence, we believe the introduced cSP detection routine would be feasible for online cSP detection, in such a way that is presently used to detect the motor evoked potentials.
皮质静息期 (cSP) 是经颅磁刺激 (TMS) 诱导主动肌肉收缩时肌电图 (EMG) 的短暂中断。cSP 是皮质抑制的一种度量,被认为代表抑制性中间神经元对兴奋的运动皮质区的影响。几种病理状况和药物操作会导致 cSP 持续时间发生变化,表明皮质内抑制作用发生了改变。目前,通常手动分析从测量的 EMG 得出的 cSP 持续时间。然而,为了避免对 cSP 解释和检测的检查者间效应,以及允许在线快速测量,自动化常规将是优选的。在这项研究中,我们评估了一种基于分析 TMS 后 EMG 信号的校正一阶导数的简单 cSP 检测常规的可行性。先前对 54 名健康受试者的 cSP 进行了重新分析,由两位作者手动分析和使用自动化常规分析。此外,我们招募了一位受试者,用几种刺激强度诱导 cSP,由两位作者手动分析以及使用自动化常规分析这些 cSP。我们发现,自动化 cSP 检测常规正确地检测到了 cSP,并且与手动分析的特定于受试者的平均 cSP 具有极好的一致性(ICC=0.992,p<0.001)。检查者间的可变性与手动和自动分析之间的可变性相似。因此,我们相信所引入的 cSP 检测常规将适用于在线 cSP 检测,就像目前用于检测运动诱发电位一样。