Comments to the response of Rodríguez-Navarro.
作者信息
Bornmann Lutz, Marx Werner
出版信息
EMBO Rep. 2013 Jun;14(6):493-4. doi: 10.1038/embor.2013.63. Epub 2013 May 14.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Comments to the response of Rodríguez-Navarro.
EMBO Rep. 2013 Jun;14(6):493-4. doi: 10.1038/embor.2013.63. Epub 2013 May 14.
2
Response to 'How good is research really?'.
EMBO Rep. 2013 Jun;14(6):493. doi: 10.1038/embor.2013.60. Epub 2013 May 14.
3
Toxins: State of the Journal Report, 2017.
Toxins (Basel). 2017 Feb 4;9(2):55. doi: 10.3390/toxins9020055.
4
Ball and chain.
Nat Immunol. 2010 Oct;11(10):873. doi: 10.1038/ni1010-873.
5
How good is research really? Measuring the citation impact of publications with percentiles increases correct assessments and fair comparisons.
EMBO Rep. 2013 Mar 1;14(3):226-30. doi: 10.1038/embor.2013.9. Epub 2012 Feb 12.
6
The journal and 2011: a time for stocktaking.
Chest. 2011 Jan;139(1):2-5. doi: 10.1378/chest.10-3010.
7
Is the journal impact factor a valid indicator of scientific value?
Singapore Med J. 2009 Aug;50(8):749-51.
8
Editorial Board Position statement regarding the Declaration on Research Assessment (DORA) recommendations with respect to journal impact factors.
Res Q Exerc Sport. 2014 Dec;85(4):429-30. doi: 10.1080/02701367.2014.964104.
9
[Unpublished, originality, importance, publicity, interest, and impact of scientific articles].
Arq Bras Oftalmol. 2008 Jul-Aug;71(4):473-4. doi: 10.1590/s0004-27492008000400001.
10
Impact, quality and inclusiveness in Australasian Journal on Ageing.
Australas J Ageing. 2017 Mar;36(1):8. doi: 10.1111/ajag.12400.
本文引用的文献
1
Change of perspective: bibliometrics from the point of view of cited references-a literature overview on approaches to the evaluation of cited references in bibliometrics.
Scientometrics. 2016;109(2):1397-1415. doi: 10.1007/s11192-016-2111-2. Epub 2016 Aug 20.
2
Response to 'How good is research really?'.
EMBO Rep. 2013 Jun;14(6):493. doi: 10.1038/embor.2013.60. Epub 2013 May 14.
3
How good is research really? Measuring the citation impact of publications with percentiles increases correct assessments and fair comparisons.
EMBO Rep. 2013 Mar 1;14(3):226-30. doi: 10.1038/embor.2013.9. Epub 2012 Feb 12.
4
Measuring the societal impact of research: research is less and less assessed on scientific impact alone--we should aim to quantify the increasingly important contributions of science to society.
EMBO Rep. 2012 Aug;13(8):673-6. doi: 10.1038/embor.2012.99. Epub 2012 Jul 10.
5
A simple index for the high-citation tail of citation distribution to quantify research performance in countries and institutions.
PLoS One. 2011;6(5):e20510. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0020510. Epub 2011 May 27.
6
Quality versus quantity: assessing individual research performance.
Sci Transl Med. 2011 May 25;3(84):84cm13. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.3002249.
Zotero 插件