Suppr超能文献

咳嗽反射试验与吸入性仪器评估的比较。

Comparison of cough reflex test against instrumental assessment of aspiration.

机构信息

University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand; University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.

出版信息

Physiol Behav. 2013 Jun 13;118:25-31. doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2013.05.004. Epub 2013 May 12.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Silent aspiration is associated with pneumonia and mortality, and is poorly identified by traditional clinical swallowing evaluation (CSE). The aim of this study was to validate cough reflex testing (CRT) for identification of silent aspiration against aspiration confirmed by instrumental assessment.

METHODS

Cough reflex threshold testing was completed on all patients using inhaled, nebulised citric acid. Within an hour, 80 patients underwent videofluoroscopic study of swallowing (VFSS) and 101 patients underwent fibreoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing (FEES). All tests were recorded and analysed by two researchers blinded to the result of the alternate test.

RESULTS

Significant associations between CRT result and cough response to aspiration on VFSS (X(2) (2)=11.046, p=.003) and FEES (X(2) (2)=34.079, p<.001) were identified. Sensitivity and specificity were optimised at 0.6mol/L in patients undergoing VFSS (71%, 60% respectively) and at 0.4mol/L in patients undergoing FEES (69%, 71% respectively). A concentration of 0.8mol/L had the highest odds ratio (OR) for detecting silent aspiration (8 based on VFSS; 7 based on FEES).

CONCLUSION

CRT results are significantly associated with aspiration response on instrumental assessment. Lower concentrations of citric acid provide a better predictive measure of silent aspiration.

摘要

背景

无声吸入与肺炎和死亡率有关,传统的临床吞咽评估(CSE)很难识别。本研究的目的是验证咳嗽反射测试(CRT)对仪器评估确认的无声吸入的识别能力。

方法

对所有患者使用吸入雾化柠檬酸进行咳嗽反射阈测试。在一个小时内,80 名患者接受了吞咽荧光透视检查(VFSS),101 名患者接受了纤维内镜吞咽评估(FEES)。所有测试均由两名研究人员进行记录和分析,他们对替代测试的结果一无所知。

结果

CRT 结果与 VFSS(X(2) (2)=11.046,p=.003)和 FEES(X(2) (2)=34.079,p<.001)中对吸入物的咳嗽反应之间存在显著关联。在接受 VFSS 的患者中,优化了 0.6mol/L 的 CRT 结果(敏感性为 71%,特异性为 60%),在接受 FEES 的患者中,优化了 0.4mol/L 的 CRT 结果(敏感性为 69%,特异性为 71%)。柠檬酸浓度为 0.8mol/L 时,对检测无声吸入的比值比(OR)最高(基于 VFSS 为 8;基于 FEES 为 7)。

结论

CRT 结果与仪器评估的吸入反应显著相关。较低浓度的柠檬酸提供了对无声吸入更好的预测指标。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验