Cohn T G, Wertsch J J, Pasupuleti D V, Loftsgaarden J D, Schenk V A
Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL.
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1990 Jul;71(8):579-82.
Variables known to affect the sensory nerve action potential (SNAP) include the method of measuring the SNAP, electrode placement and local impedance, volume conduction, temperature, age, nerve fiber composition, and duration dependent phase cancellation. There is debate, however, concerning the effect of orthodromic vs antidromic stimulation on the latency of the SNAP. This question was studied with the same methodology of those who reported a difference between antidromic and orthodromic latencies, but with control of the interelectrode distance. Twenty-five normal hands were studied. The median and ulnar digital nerves were analyzed both orthodromically and antidromically. There was careful control of interelectrode distance, which was the same for both the recording and stimulating electrodes. Studies were done with both a 3-cm and 4-cm interelectrode distance. Parameters recorded were onset latency, peak latency, terminal latency, and amplitude (baseline to negative peak, and peak to peak). Extensive statistical analysis was performed for all parameters. No differences were found between antidromic and orthodromic studies when the interelectrode distance was the same.
已知会影响感觉神经动作电位(SNAP)的变量包括测量SNAP的方法、电极放置和局部阻抗、容积传导、温度、年龄、神经纤维组成以及持续时间依赖性相位抵消。然而,关于顺向刺激与逆向刺激对SNAP潜伏期的影响存在争议。本研究采用了与那些报告逆向和顺向潜伏期存在差异的研究相同的方法,但控制了电极间距离。对25只正常手进行了研究。对正中神经和尺神经的指神经分别进行了顺向和逆向分析。仔细控制了电极间距离,记录电极和刺激电极的距离相同。研究在电极间距离为3厘米和4厘米时均进行。记录的参数有起始潜伏期、峰值潜伏期、终末潜伏期和波幅(基线到负峰以及峰到峰)。对所有参数进行了广泛的统计分析。当电极间距离相同时,逆向和顺向研究未发现差异。