Suppr超能文献

采样技术对于咽淋病的最佳分离至关重要。

Sampling technique is important for optimal isolation of pharyngeal gonorrhoea.

机构信息

Melbourne Sexual Health Centre, Alfred Health, , Carlton, Victoria, Australia.

出版信息

Sex Transm Infect. 2013 Nov;89(7):557-60. doi: 10.1136/sextrans-2013-051077. Epub 2013 May 21.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Culture is insensitive for the detection of pharyngeal gonorrhoea but isolation is pivotal to antimicrobial resistance surveillance. The aim of this study was to ascertain whether recommendations provided to clinicians (doctors and nurses) on pharyngeal swabbing technique could improve gonorrhoea detection rates and to determine which aspects of swabbing technique are important for optimal isolation.

METHODS

This study was undertaken at the Melbourne Sexual Health Centre, Australia. Detection rates among clinicians for pharyngeal gonorrhoea were compared before (June 2006-May 2009) and after (June 2009-June 2012) recommendations on swabbing technique were provided. Associations between detection rates and reported swabbing technique obtained via a clinician questionnaire were examined.

RESULTS

The overall yield from testing before and after provision of the recommendations among 28 clinicians was 1.6% (134/8586) and 1.8% (264/15,046) respectively (p=0.17). Significantly higher detection rates were seen following the recommendations among clinicians who reported a change in their swabbing technique in response to the recommendations (2.1% vs. 1.5%; p=0.004), swabbing a larger surface area (2.0% vs. 1.5%; p=0.02), applying more swab pressure (2.5% vs. 1.5%; p<0.001) and a change in the anatomical sites they swabbed (2.2% vs. 1.5%; p=0.002). The predominant change in sites swabbed was an increase in swabbing of the oropharynx: from a median of 0% to 80% of the time.

CONCLUSIONS

More thorough swabbing improves the isolation of pharyngeal gonorrhoea using culture. Clinicians should receive training to ensure swabbing is performed with sufficient pressure and that it covers an adequate area that includes the oropharynx.

摘要

背景

文化对咽淋病的检测不敏感,但分离对于抗菌药物耐药性监测至关重要。本研究的目的是确定向临床医生(医生和护士)提供的咽拭子技术建议是否可以提高淋病检测率,并确定哪些拭子技术方面对于最佳隔离很重要。

方法

本研究在澳大利亚墨尔本性健康中心进行。比较了在提供咽拭子技术建议之前(2006 年 6 月至 2009 年 5 月)和之后(2009 年 6 月至 2012 年 6 月)临床医生检测咽淋病的检测率。通过临床医生问卷获得的检测率与报告的拭子技术之间的关联进行了检查。

结果

在 28 位临床医生中,在提供建议之前和之后,从检测中得出的总体产量分别为 1.6%(134/8586)和 1.8%(264/15046)(p=0.17)。在回应建议后改变拭子技术的临床医生中,检测率显著更高(2.1%比 1.5%;p=0.004),拭子面积更大(2.0%比 1.5%;p=0.02),施加更多的拭子压力(2.5%比 1.5%;p<0.001)和改变他们拭子的解剖部位(2.2%比 1.5%;p=0.002)。拭子部位的主要变化是增加了对口咽的拭子:从中位数的 0%增加到 80%的时间。

结论

更彻底的拭子可改善使用培养物分离咽淋病。临床医生应接受培训,以确保拭子施加足够的压力并且覆盖足够的面积,包括口咽。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验