From the Department of Anaesthesiology, Intensive Care and Pain Medicine, Münster University Hospital (RPL, PE, SW, ST, HVA, KH, AB), the Faculty of Medicine, Studienhospital Münster (HF), the Institute of Biostatistics and Clinical Research, University of Münster (JG), the City of Münster Fire Department (AB), Münster, Germany *Roman-Patrik Lukas and Philipp Engel contributed equally to the writing of the article.
Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2013 Dec;30(12):752-7. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0b013e328362147f.
The 2010 Resuscitation Guidelines require high-quality chest compression and rapid defibrillation for patients with ventricular fibrillation with rhythm analysis and defibrillation repeated every 2 min. A lack of adherence to the guidelines by medical students was observed during simulated resuscitation training.
To assess whether real-time cardiopulmonary resuscitation guidance, including an audiovisual countdown timer, a metronome, a display of the chest compression quality and voice prompts, might improve adherence to the guidelines by medical students.
Randomised cross-over simulation study.
Studienhospital Münster, Faculty of Medicine University Münster, Germany
One hundred and forty-one medical students (fifth year) in 47 teams.
Simulated resuscitation with and without real-time cardiopulmonary resuscitation guidance.
The preshock pause, postshock pause, fraction of time without chest compression and defibrillation intervals. Observed quality parameters were chest compression depth and chest compression rate.
With real-time cardiopulmonary resuscitation guidance, there were improved mean (SD) chest compression rates (105 ± 8 vs. 121 ± 12 bpm; P < 0.005), fewer inappropriate shock intervals [median (interquartile range) 0 (1 to 5) vs. 4 (1 to 7); P < 0.005], a smaller fraction of time without chest compression (18.9 ± 4.4 vs. 22.5 ± 7.0%; P < 0.005) and shorter postshock pauses (2.3 ± 0.9 vs. 3.4 ± 1.2 s; P < 0.005).
Real-time cardiopulmonary resuscitation guidance significantly increased adherence to the guidelines by medical students treating simulated out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Using a simple tool such as a countdown timer makes it possible to reduce the number of inappropriate shock intervals and time without chest compression.
2010 年复苏指南要求对有心律分析和除颤的室颤患者进行高质量的胸部按压和快速除颤,每 2 分钟重复除颤和节律分析。在模拟复苏培训中观察到医学生对指南的遵守情况较差。
评估实时心肺复苏指导(包括视听倒数计时器、节拍器、显示胸部按压质量和语音提示)是否可以提高医学生对指南的依从性。
随机交叉模拟研究。
德国明斯特大学医学系明斯特研究医院
47 个团队的 141 名医学生(五年级)。
有和没有实时心肺复苏指导的模拟复苏。
预除颤暂停、除颤后暂停、无胸部按压时间分数和除颤间隔。观察到的质量参数是胸部按压深度和胸部按压频率。
使用实时心肺复苏指导,平均(SD)胸部按压频率提高(105±8 比 121±12 bpm;P<0.005),不适当的除颤间隔减少[中位数(四分位距)0(1 至 5)比 4(1 至 7);P<0.005],无胸部按压时间分数减少(18.9±4.4 比 22.5±7.0%;P<0.005),除颤后暂停时间缩短(2.3±0.9 比 3.4±1.2 s;P<0.005)。
实时心肺复苏指导显著提高了医学生对治疗模拟院外心脏骤停的指南的依从性。使用简单的工具(如倒计时定时器)可以减少不适当的除颤间隔和无胸部按压时间。