School of Public Health, University of California, Berkeley, CA, USA.
Acta Trop. 2013 Sep;127(3):226-35. doi: 10.1016/j.actatropica.2013.05.009. Epub 2013 May 24.
Health education is an important component of efforts to control schistosomiasis. In China, while education programmes have been implemented intensively, few articles in recent years in either the Chinese or English literature report randomised, controlled interventions of the impacts on knowledge, attitudes and behaviours. Thus, we designed and carried out a cluster-randomised controlled education intervention trial that targeted 706 adults from rural areas in 28 villages in Sichuan, China. We evaluated the effects of the intervention on five endpoints: (1) schistosomiasis knowledge, (2) attitudes towards infection testing and treatment, (3) use of personal protective equipment (PPE), (4) reducing defecation in the field, and (5) reducing dermal contact with potentially contaminated water sources. The results indicated that people in both the intervention and control groups showed improvement in knowledge, attitudes and reduction in field-defecation in the follow-up surveys. However, there was little evidence that suggested statistically significant differences between the two groups regarding any endpoint. Participation in intervention classes was associated with age, gender, occupation and education level. Our study suggests short-term health education interventions may not be effective in improving schistosomiasis knowledge or in the adoption of health-protective behaviours. This might be partially due to the spontaneous learning process of people subject to repeated surveys and other disease control activities. Considering the difficulties of occupation-associated behaviour change and knowledge reinforcement in general, longer-term education programmes should be considered in the future.
健康教育是控制血吸虫病努力的重要组成部分。在中国,虽然已经实施了密集的教育计划,但近年来中文或英文文献中几乎没有报道过针对知识、态度和行为影响的随机对照干预措施。因此,我们设计并实施了一项针对中国四川省 28 个村庄的 706 名农村成年人的群组随机对照教育干预试验。我们评估了干预对五个终点的影响:(1)血吸虫病知识,(2)对感染检测和治疗的态度,(3)使用个人防护设备(PPE),(4)减少田间排便,(5)减少与潜在污染水源的皮肤接触。结果表明,干预组和对照组的人群在随访调查中,知识、态度和田间排便减少都有所改善。然而,几乎没有证据表明两组在任何终点上存在统计学上的显著差异。参与干预班与年龄、性别、职业和教育水平有关。我们的研究表明,短期健康教育干预措施可能无法有效提高血吸虫病知识或促进健康保护行为。这可能部分是由于人们受到重复调查和其他疾病控制活动的自发学习过程的影响。考虑到一般职业相关行为改变和知识强化的困难,未来应该考虑更长期的教育计划。