Department of General Surgery, Trabzon Numune Training and Research Hospital, Maras Str., 61040 Trabzon, Turkey.
World J Surg. 2013 Sep;37(9):2074-80. doi: 10.1007/s00268-013-2111-9.
Although various methods have been described for surgical treatment of pilonidal sinus disease, which is best is under debate. Tension-free techniques seem to be most ideal. We aimed to evaluate the effects of two tension-free methods in terms of patient satisfaction, postoperative complications, and early recurrence.
A group of 122 patients were prospectively included in the study. Patients were divided into two groups based on the operative method used: Limberg flap or Bascom cleft lift. Quality of life scores, pain scores, length of time for healing, hospital stay, surgical area-related complications, excised tissue weight, and early recurrence information were evaluated.
Follow-up of patients in each group was completed. Patients in the Bascom cleft lift group had shorter operation duration, less excised tissue weight, better bodily pain score, and less role limitation due to physical problems score on postoperative day 10. There was no statistically significant difference between groups for the other criteria.
Although both techniques provided good results during the early period, the Bascom cleft lift procedure is a reliable technique that provides shorter operation duration and better quality of life during the early postoperative period.
虽然已经有多种方法被描述用于治疗藏毛窦疾病,但哪种方法是最好的仍存在争议。无张力技术似乎是最理想的。我们旨在评估两种无张力方法在患者满意度、术后并发症和早期复发方面的效果。
将 122 例患者前瞻性纳入本研究。根据所使用的手术方法将患者分为两组:Limberg 皮瓣或 Bascom 裂沟提升术。评估生活质量评分、疼痛评分、愈合时间、住院时间、手术部位相关并发症、切除组织重量以及早期复发信息。
对每组患者的随访均已完成。Bascom 裂沟提升组的患者手术时间更短、切除组织重量更少、术后第 10 天的身体疼痛评分更好、因身体问题导致的角色限制更少。其他标准在组间没有统计学上的显著差异。
虽然两种技术在早期都能取得良好的效果,但 Bascom 裂沟提升术是一种可靠的技术,可在术后早期提供更短的手术时间和更高的生活质量。