Department of Psychology, University of Frankfurt, Germany.
Am J Psychiatry. 2013 Jun;170(6):624-32. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2013.12060734.
This multicenter study compared the relapse and recurrence outcomes of two active treatments, maintenance cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) and manualized psychoeducation, both in addition to treatment as usual, in patients in remission from depression.
This was a multicenter prospective randomized observer-blinded study with two parallel groups. The authors assessed 180 patients with three or more previous major depressive episodes who met remission criteria over a 2-month baseline period and who were randomly assigned to 16 sessions of either maintenance CBT or manualized psychoeducation over 8 months and then followed up for 12 months. The main outcome measure was time to first relapse or recurrence of a major depression, based on DSM-IV criteria, as assessed by blinded observers with the Longitudinal Interval Follow-Up Evaluation.
Cox regression analysis showed that time to relapse or recurrence of major depression did not differ significantly between treatment conditions, but a significant interaction was observed between treatment condition and number of previous episodes (<5 or ≥5). Within the subsample of patients with five or more previous episodes, maintenance CBT was significantly superior to manualized psychoeducation, whereas for patients with fewer than five previous episodes, no significant treatment differences were observed in time to relapse or recurrence.
The results indicate that maintenance CBT has significant effects on the prevention of relapse or recurrence only in patients with a high risk of depression recurrence. For patients with a moderate risk of recurrence, nonspecific effects and structured patient education may be equally effective.
本多中心研究比较了两种积极治疗方法(维持认知行为疗法[CBT]和基于手册的心理教育)在缓解期抑郁症患者中的复发和再发结局,两种治疗方法均在常规治疗之外进行。
这是一项多中心前瞻性随机观察者盲法研究,有两个平行组。作者评估了 180 名符合缓解标准的、有 3 次或以上既往重度抑郁发作的患者,他们在 2 个月的基线期内符合缓解标准,并随机分配到 16 次维持性 CBT 或基于手册的心理教育中,持续 8 个月,然后随访 12 个月。主要结局指标是基于 DSM-IV 标准的首次复发或再发重度抑郁的时间,由盲法观察者使用纵向间隔随访评估进行评估。
Cox 回归分析显示,治疗条件之间复发或再发重度抑郁的时间无显著差异,但治疗条件和既往发作次数(<5 次或≥5 次)之间存在显著交互作用。在既往发作 5 次或以上的患者亚组中,维持性 CBT 明显优于基于手册的心理教育,而在既往发作少于 5 次的患者中,复发或再发的时间无显著治疗差异。
结果表明,维持性 CBT 仅对高复发风险的抑郁症患者有显著的预防复发或再发的效果。对于复发风险中等的患者,非特异性效果和结构化的患者教育可能同样有效。