Suppr超能文献

患者对临床试验和试验者优先级的认知比较。

A comparison of patient knowledge of clinical trials and trialist priorities.

机构信息

Department of Oncology, Faculty of Health Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON. ; Present affiliation: Faculty of Health Sciences, Queen's University, Kingston, ON.

出版信息

Curr Oncol. 2013 Jun;20(3):e193-205. doi: 10.3747/co.20.1323.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Recruitment to clinical trials remains poor, and patient knowledge of clinical trials is one barrier to recruitment. To identify knowledge deficits, we conducted and compared surveys measuring actual patient knowledge and clinical trialist priorities for patient knowledge.

METHODS

Consenting patients at a tertiary cancer centre answered a survey that included 2 opinion questions about their own knowledge and willingness to join a trial, and22 knowledge questions. Clinical researchers at the centre were asked 13 questions about the importance of various trials factors.

RESULTS

Of 126 patients surveyed, 16% had joined a clinical trial, and 42% had a secondary school education or less. The mean correct response rate on the knowledge questions was 58%. Higher rates of correct responses were associated with lower age (p = 0.05), greater education (p = 0.006), prior trial participation (p < 0.001), agreement or strong agreement with perceived understanding of trials (p < 0.001), and willingness to join a clinical trial (p = 0.002). Trialists valued an understanding of the rationale for clinical trials and of randomization, placebo, and patient protection, but those particular topics were poorly understood by patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Patient knowledge about clinical trials is poor, including knowledge of several concepts ranked important by clinical trialists. The findings suggest that when developing education interventions, emphasis should be placed on the topics most directly related to patient care, and factors such as age and education level should be considered.

摘要

背景

临床试验的招募工作仍然不佳,而患者对临床试验的了解是招募的一个障碍。为了确定知识缺陷,我们进行了并比较了两项调查,以衡量患者的实际知识和临床试验研究者对患者知识的重视程度。

方法

在一家三级癌症中心同意参加的患者回答了一项调查,其中包括两个关于他们自己的知识和参加试验意愿的观点问题,以及 22 个知识问题。中心的临床研究人员被问到关于各种试验因素重要性的 13 个问题。

结果

在接受调查的 126 名患者中,16%的患者参加过临床试验,42%的患者接受过中学或以下教育。知识问题的正确回答率平均为 58%。更高的正确回答率与较低的年龄(p = 0.05)、更高的教育程度(p = 0.006)、先前参加过试验(p < 0.001)、对试验理解的一致性或强烈一致性(p < 0.001)以及愿意参加临床试验(p = 0.002)相关。试验人员重视对临床试验的基本原理以及对随机化、安慰剂和患者保护的理解,但这些特定主题被患者理解得很差。

结论

患者对临床试验的了解很差,包括对临床试验人员认为重要的几个概念的了解。研究结果表明,在制定教育干预措施时,应重点关注与患者护理最直接相关的主题,并且应考虑年龄和教育水平等因素。

相似文献

7
Can patients set their own educational priorities?
Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 1995 Nov;30(2):131-6. doi: 10.1016/0168-8227(95)01160-9.
10
Involving South Asian patients in clinical trials.让南亚患者参与临床试验。
Health Technol Assess. 2004 Oct;8(42):iii, 1-109. doi: 10.3310/hta8420.

引用本文的文献

3
Exploring patient-reported barriers to participating in proton therapy clinical trials.探索患者报告的参与质子治疗临床试验的障碍。
Tech Innov Patient Support Radiat Oncol. 2023 Dec 13;29:100230. doi: 10.1016/j.tipsro.2023.100230. eCollection 2024 Mar.

本文引用的文献

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验