Suppr超能文献

经穹窿法行保留面神经和听力的经颈静脉微创入路切除颈静脉球瘤。

Less invasive transjugular approach with Fallopian bridge technique for facial nerve protection and hearing preservation in surgery of glomus jugulare tumors.

机构信息

Division of Neurosurgery, Duke University Medical Center, Box 3807, 1000 Trent Drive 4520 Hosp South, Durham, NC, 27710, USA,

出版信息

Neurosurg Rev. 2013 Oct;36(4):579-86; discussion 586. doi: 10.1007/s10143-013-0482-x. Epub 2013 Jun 6.

Abstract

For the past three decades, surgery of glomus jugulare tumors (GJTs) has been characterized by extensive combined head and neck, neuro-otologic, and neurosurgical approaches. In recent years, the authors have modified the operative technique to a less invasive approach for preservation of cranial nerves while achieving satisfactory tumor resection. We evaluated and compared the clinical outcomes of our current less invasive approach with our previous more extensive procedures. The clinical records of 39 cases of GJT surgically treated between 1992 and 2011 were retrospectively reviewed. The less invasive transjugular approach with Fallopian bridge technique (LI-TJ) was used for the most recent five cases. The combined transmastoid-transjugular and high cervical (TM-HC) approach was performed in 30 cases, while four cases were treated with a transmastoid-transsigmoid approach with facial nerve translocation. Operative technique, extent of tumor resection, operating time, hospital stay, and morbidity were examined through the operative records, and a comparison was made between the LI-TJ cases and the more invasive cases. No facial nerve palsy was seen in the LI-TJ group while the TM-HC group demonstrated six cases (17.6%) of facial palsy (House-Brackmann facial nerve function grading scale grade II and III). The complication rate was 0 % in the LI-TJ group and 16.7% in the more invasive group. The mean operative time and hospital stay were shorter in the LI-TJ group (6.4 h and 4.3 days, respectively) compared with the more invasive group (10.7 h and 8.0 days, respectively). The LI-TJ approach with Fallopian bridge technique provided adequate tumor resection with cranial preservation and definitive advantage over the more extensive approach.

摘要

在过去的三十年中,颈静脉球体瘤(GJT)的手术一直以广泛的头颈部、神经耳科学和神经外科方法为特征。近年来,作者对手术技术进行了修改,采用了一种侵入性较小的方法,在保留颅神经的同时实现了满意的肿瘤切除。我们评估并比较了我们目前的微创方法与以前更广泛的手术的临床结果。回顾性分析了 1992 年至 2011 年间手术治疗的 39 例 GJT 患者的临床资料。最近五例采用经颈静脉内瘘桥技术(LI-TJ)的微创经颈静脉入路。30 例采用经乳突-颈静脉联合高位颈(TM-HC)入路,4 例采用经乳突-经乙状窦转位面神经入路。通过手术记录检查手术技术、肿瘤切除范围、手术时间、住院时间和发病率,并对 LI-TJ 组和更广泛的侵袭性组进行比较。LI-TJ 组无面神经瘫痪,TM-HC 组有 6 例(17.6%)面神经瘫痪(House-Brackmann 面神经功能分级量表 II 级和 III 级)。LI-TJ 组的并发症发生率为 0%,而更广泛的侵袭性组为 16.7%。LI-TJ 组的平均手术时间和住院时间分别为 6.4 小时和 4.3 天,明显短于更广泛的侵袭性组(分别为 10.7 小时和 8.0 天)。与更广泛的入路相比,采用经颈静脉内瘘桥技术的 LI-TJ 入路提供了充分的肿瘤切除,并在颅神经保留和明确优势方面具有明显优势。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验