Suppr超能文献

不同流速下碘输送率对疑似肺栓塞患者双能 CT 图像质量的影响。

Impact of iodine delivery rate with varying flow rates on image quality in dual-energy CT of patients with suspected pulmonary embolism.

机构信息

Institute of Clinical Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Center Mannheim, Medical Faculty Mannheim - Heidelberg University, Theodor-Kutzer-Ufer 1-3, D-68167 Mannheim, Germany.

出版信息

Acad Radiol. 2013 Aug;20(8):962-71. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2013.02.013. Epub 2013 Jun 6.

Abstract

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES

To prospectively compare four contrast material injection protocols for dual-energy computed tomography (CT) pulmonary angiography (DE-CTPA) in patients with suspected pulmonary embolism (PE).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

One hundred twenty consecutive patients were randomized to contrast material injection protocols defined by different iodine concentrations and iodine delivery rates (IDRs): (A) 80 mL iopromide 370/4 mL/sec = IDR 1.4 gI/sec; (B) 80 mL iopromide 370 at 3 mL/sec = IDR 1.1 gI/sec; (C) 98 mL iopromide 300 at 4.9 mL/sec = IDR 1.4 gI/sec; and (D) 98 mL iopromide 300 at 3.7 mL/sec = IDR 1.1 gI/sec. Attenuation values were measured in the inflow tract (subclavian vein-superior vena cava-right atrium), target tract (right ventricle-pulmonary trunk-pulmonary arteries), and outflow tract (left atrium-left ventricle-ascending aorta). Two readers assessed subjective image quality of CTPA images and iodine perfusion maps. The number of artifacts due to hyperdense contrast material on iodine perfusion maps was recorded.

RESULTS

Target tract attenuation was highest for protocol A with 374 ± 98 Hounsfield units (HU) (highly concentrated contrast material/high IDR). This was significant compared to protocols B and D (P = .0118, P = .0427) but not compared to protocol C (P = .3395). No significant difference in target tract attenuation was found between protocols B (309 ± 80 HU), protocol C (352 ± 119 HU), and D (325 ± 74 HU). CTPA and iodine perfusion map image quality for protocol A was rated significantly higher compared to all other protocols (median score = 5/4; P < .0001 for both) with moderate interreader agreement (κ = 0.58/0.47). Protocols A and B displayed increased artifacts on iodine perfusion maps compared to protocols C and D (3 versus 2).

CONCLUSION

Despite increased artifacts on iodine perfusion maps, highly concentrated iodinated contrast material combined with high flow rates provides improved diagnostic image quality and has the highest target-tract attenuation for DE-CTPA protocols.

摘要

背景与目的

前瞻性比较 4 种不同对比剂注射方案在疑似肺动脉栓塞(PE)患者双能 CT 肺动脉造影(DE-CTPA)中的应用。

材料与方法

120 例连续患者被随机分配至不同碘浓度和碘流率(IDR)的对比剂注射方案:(A)80ml 碘普罗胺 370/4ml/sec=IDR1.4gI/sec;(B)80ml 碘普罗胺 370 以 3ml/sec 注射=IDR1.1gI/sec;(C)98ml 碘普罗胺 300 以 4.9ml/sec 注射=IDR1.4gI/sec;(D)98ml 碘普罗胺 300 以 3.7ml/sec 注射=IDR1.1gI/sec。在流入道(锁骨下静脉-上腔静脉-右心房)、靶道(右心室-肺动脉干-肺动脉)和流出道(左心房-左心室-升主动脉)测量衰减值。2 位读者评估了 CTPA 图像和碘灌注图的主观图像质量。记录碘灌注图上由于高密度对比剂导致的伪影数量。

结果

方案 A 中靶道衰减最高,为 374±98 个 Hounsfield 单位(HU)(高浓度对比剂/高 IDR)。与方案 B 和 D 相比,这具有显著差异(P=0.0118,P=0.0427),但与方案 C 相比无显著差异(P=0.3395)。方案 B(309±80HU)、方案 C(352±119HU)和方案 D(325±74HU)之间的靶道衰减无显著差异。方案 A 的 CTPA 和碘灌注图图像质量评分明显高于其他所有方案(中位数评分=5/4;两者均 P<0.0001),两位读者之间的一致性为中等(κ=0.58/0.47)。与方案 C 和 D 相比,方案 A 和 B 的碘灌注图上的伪影更多(3 个与 2 个)。

结论

尽管碘灌注图上的伪影增加,但高浓度碘化对比剂联合高流速可提供更高质量的诊断图像,并且对于 DE-CTPA 方案来说具有最高的靶道衰减。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验