后牙陶瓷嵌体的考量：一篇综述
Considerations for ceramic inlays in posterior teeth: a review.
作者信息
Hopp Christa D, Land Martin F
机构信息
Section of Operative Dentistry.
出版信息
Clin Cosmet Investig Dent. 2013 Apr 18;5:21-32. doi: 10.2147/CCIDE.S42016. Print 2013.
Abstract
This review of ceramic inlays in posterior teeth includes a review of the history of ceramic restorations, followed by common indications and contraindications for their use. A discussion on the potential for tooth wear is followed by a review of recommended preparation design considerations, fabrication methods, and material choices. Despite the improved materials available for fabrication of porcelain inlays, fracture remains a primary mode of inlay failure. Therefore, a brief discussion on strengthening methods for ceramics is included. The review concludes with a section on luting considerations, and offers the clinician specific recommendations for luting procedures. In conclusion, inlay success rates and longevity, as reported in the literature, are summarized.
摘要
这篇关于后牙陶瓷嵌体的综述涵盖了陶瓷修复体的历史回顾，随后介绍了其使用的常见适应证和禁忌证。在讨论牙齿磨损可能性之后，回顾了推荐的预备设计考量、制作方法和材料选择。尽管用于制作瓷嵌体的材料有所改进，但折裂仍是嵌体失败的主要方式。因此，本文包含了关于陶瓷增强方法的简要讨论。综述最后一部分是关于粘结的考量，并为临床医生提供了粘结操作的具体建议。最后，总结了文献中报道的嵌体成功率和使用寿命。
相似文献
1
Considerations for ceramic inlays in posterior teeth: a review.后牙陶瓷嵌体的考量：一篇综述
Clin Cosmet Investig Dent. 2013 Apr 18;5:21-32. doi: 10.2147/CCIDE.S42016. Print 2013.
2
Effect of cavity preparation design and ceramic type on the stress distribution, strain and fracture resistance of CAD/CAM onlays in molars.窝洞预备设计和陶瓷类型对磨牙CAD/CAM高嵌体应力分布、应变及抗折性的影响。
J Appl Oral Sci. 2018;26:e20180004. doi: 10.1590/1678-7757-2018-0004. Epub 2018 Aug 20.
3
Marginal gap, internal fit, and fracture load of leucite-reinforced ceramic inlays fabricated by CEREC inLab and hot-pressed techniques.CEREC inLab 和热压技术制作的铸瓷嵌体的边缘间隙、内部适合性和断裂载荷。
J Prosthodont. 2011 Oct;20(7):535-40. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-849X.2011.00745.x. Epub 2011 Aug 1.
4
Fracture resistance of prepared premolars restored with bonded new lab composite and all-ceramic inlay/onlay restorations: Laboratory study.用黏结型新型牙本质复合树脂和全瓷嵌体/高嵌体修复的预备前磨牙的抗折性能：实验室研究。
J Esthet Restor Dent. 2018 May;30(3):229-239. doi: 10.1111/jerd.12364. Epub 2018 Jan 25.
5
[Comparison of clinical efficacy of CAD/CAM all -ceramic inlay and polymerid porcelain inlay in restoration of posterior Class II cavity].CAD/CAM全瓷嵌体与聚合瓷嵌体修复后牙Ⅱ类洞的临床疗效比较
Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue. 2018 Feb;27(1):61-64.
6
Fifteen-year outcome of posterior all-ceramic inlay-retained fixed dental prostheses.后牙全瓷嵌体固位固定修复体的 15 年疗效。
J Dent. 2019 Oct;89:103174. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2019.07.012. Epub 2019 Jul 27.
7
10.9-year survival of pressed acid etched monolithic e.max lithium disilicate glass-ceramic partial coverage restorations: Performance and outcomes as a function of tooth position, age, sex, and the type of partial coverage restoration (inlay or onlay).压铸酸蚀整块e.max二硅酸锂玻璃陶瓷部分覆盖修复体的10.9年生存率：作为牙齿位置、年龄、性别和部分覆盖修复体类型（嵌体或高嵌体）函数的性能和结果
J Prosthet Dent. 2021 Oct;126(4):523-532. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2020.07.015. Epub 2020 Oct 2.
8
Cement Thickness of Inlay Restorations Made of Lithium Disilicate, Polymer-Infiltrated Ceramic and Nano-Ceramic CAD/CAM Materials Evaluated Using 3D X-Ray Micro-Computed Tomography.采用 3D X 射线微计算机断层扫描评估锂硅酸盐、聚合物渗透陶瓷和纳米陶瓷 CAD/CAM 材料制成的嵌体修复体的粘结厚度。
J Prosthodont. 2018 Jun;27(5):456-460. doi: 10.1111/jopr.12521. Epub 2016 Aug 12.
9
Ceramic inlays: a case presentation and lessons learned from the literature.陶瓷嵌体：病例报告及文献经验总结
J Esthet Restor Dent. 2009;21(2):77-87. doi: 10.1111/j.1708-8240.2009.00236.x.
10
A comparison of mvM stress of inlays, onlays and endocrowns made from various materials and their bonding with molars in a computer simulation of mastication - FEA.不同材料嵌体、高嵌体和全冠的微体积应力比较及其在磨牙咀嚼计算机模拟中的粘结 - 有限元分析。
Dent Mater. 2020 Jul;36(7):854-864. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2020.04.007. Epub 2020 May 27.
引用本文的文献
1
In Vivo Wear Analysis of Leucite-Reinforced Ceramic Inlays/Onlays After 14 Years.14年后白榴石增强陶瓷嵌体/高嵌体的体内磨损分析
Materials (Basel). 2025 Jul 23;18(15):3446. doi: 10.3390/ma18153446.
2
The Influence of Deep Margin Elevation and Immediate Dentin Sealing on the Fracture Strength of Premolars Restored With Indirect Inlays: An In Vitro Study.深边缘提升和即刻牙本质封闭对间接嵌体修复前磨牙断裂强度的影响：一项体外研究
Clin Exp Dent Res. 2025 Jun;11(3):e70161. doi: 10.1002/cre2.70161.
3
Survival Rates of Glass versus Hybrid Ceramics in Partial Prosthetic Restorations: A Scoping Review with Emphasis on Adhesive Protocols.局部修复中玻璃陶瓷与混合陶瓷的存活率：一项重点关注粘结方案的范围综述
J Clin Med. 2023 Oct 25;12(21):6744. doi: 10.3390/jcm12216744.
4
Fracture Resistance of Laboratory Composite Versus All-Ceramic Restorations in Class II Inlay Cavity Preparations: An In Vitro Study.II类嵌体洞形预备中实验室复合树脂与全瓷修复体的抗折性：一项体外研究
Cureus. 2023 Sep 5;15(9):e44711. doi: 10.7759/cureus.44711. eCollection 2023 Sep.
5
Effect of immediate dentin sealing on the fracture strength of indirect overlay restorations using different types of luting agents (A comparative study).即刻牙本质封闭对使用不同类型粘结剂的间接覆盖修复体抗折强度的影响（一项对比研究）
J Conserv Dent Endod. 2023 Jul-Aug;26(4):434-440. doi: 10.4103/jcd.jcd_226_23. Epub 2023 Jul 28.
6
Effect of three different preparation designs on the marginal adaptation of indirect overlay restoration fabricated from lithium disilicate ceramic material: An in-vitro comparative study.三种不同预备设计对二硅酸锂陶瓷材料制作的间接覆盖修复体边缘适合性的影响：一项体外比较研究。
Saudi Dent J. 2023 May;35(4):372-377. doi: 10.1016/j.sdentj.2023.03.013. Epub 2023 Apr 5.
7
Effect of Preparation Design on Marginal Integrity and Fracture Resistance of Endocrowns: A Systematic Review.预备设计对内冠边缘完整性和抗折性的影响：一项系统评价
Front Dent. 2022 Nov 27;19:37. doi: 10.18502/fid.v19i37.11250. eCollection 2022.
8
Ceramic Inlays: A Case Report.陶瓷嵌体：一例报告。
Cureus. 2022 Sep 11;14(9):e29043. doi: 10.7759/cureus.29043. eCollection 2022 Sep.
9
Fracture resistance of lab composite versus all-ceramic restorations in class II inlay cavity preparations: An study.II类嵌体洞形预备中实验室复合树脂与全瓷修复体的抗折性：一项研究。
J Conserv Dent. 2022 May-Jun;25(3):258-263. doi: 10.4103/jcd.jcd_261_21. Epub 2022 Jun 13.
10
Comparative prospective clinical evaluation of computer aided design/ computer aided manufacturing milled BioHPP PEEK inlays and Zirconia inlays.计算机辅助设计/计算机辅助制造铣削 BioHPP PEEK 嵌体和氧化锆嵌体的前瞻性临床对比评估。
J Indian Prosthodont Soc. 2021 Jul-Sep;21(3):240-248. doi: 10.4103/jips.jips_57_21.
本文引用的文献
1
Ceramic materials have similar short term survival rates to other materials on posterior teeth.陶瓷材料在后牙上的短期存活率与其他材料相似。
Evid Based Dent. 2012 Jun;13(2):49. doi: 10.1038/sj.ebd.6400860.
2
Clinical performance of all-ceramic inlay and onlay restorations in posterior teeth.全瓷嵌体和高嵌体在后牙修复中的临床性能。
Int J Prosthodont. 2012 Jul-Aug;25(4):395-402.
3
The all-ceramic, inlay supported fixed partial denture. Part 3. Experimental approach for validating the finite element analysis.全瓷嵌体支持的固定局部义齿。第 3 部分。验证有限元分析的实验方法。
Aust Dent J. 2012 Mar;57(1):23-30. doi: 10.1111/j.1834-7819.2011.01638.x.
4
Inlay-retained zirconia fixed dental prosthesis: clinical and laboratory procedures.嵌体固位氧化锆固定义齿：临床及实验室操作流程
Eur J Esthet Dent. 2012 Spring;7(1):48-60.
5
Clinical long-term evaluation and failure characteristics of 1,335 all-ceramic restorations.1335 例全瓷修复体的临床长期评估和失败特征。
Int J Prosthodont. 2012 Jan-Feb;25(1):70-8.
6
A systematic review of ceramic inlays in posterior teeth: an update.系统评价在后牙嵌体中的应用：更新。
Int J Prosthodont. 2011 Nov-Dec;24(6):566-75.
7
The all-ceramic, inlay supported fixed partial denture. Part 2. Fixed partial denture design: a finite element analysis.全瓷嵌体支持的固定局部义齿。第 2 部分。固定局部义齿设计：有限元分析。
Aust Dent J. 2011 Sep;56(3):302-11. doi: 10.1111/j.1834-7819.2011.01341.x. Epub 2011 Jul 10.
8
Bonded amalgams and their use in clinical practice.粘结银汞合金及其在临床实践中的应用。
Dent Update. 2011 May;38(4):222-4, 226-8, 230. doi: 10.12968/denu.2011.38.4.222.
9
CAD/CAM Dental technology.计算机辅助设计与制造牙科技术
Compend Contin Educ Dent. 2011 May;32(4):73-6, 78-80, 82.
10
Dental clinics: a point pollution source, not only of mercury but also of other amalgam constituents.牙科诊所：一个点状污染源，不仅有汞，还有其他汞合金成分。
Chemosphere. 2011 Aug;84(8):1133-9. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2011.04.034. Epub 2011 May 4.
Zotero 插件