Suppr超能文献

谁能从焦虑障碍的认知行为疗法中获益最多?治疗剂量和患者参与的作用。

Who gets the most out of cognitive behavioral therapy for anxiety disorders? The role of treatment dose and patient engagement.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of California, Los Angeles.

RAND Corporation.

出版信息

J Consult Clin Psychol. 2013 Aug;81(4):639-649. doi: 10.1037/a0033403. Epub 2013 Jun 10.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The present study explored treatment dose and patient engagement as predictors of treatment outcome in cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) for anxiety disorders.

METHOD

Measures of high versus low treatment dose and high versus low patient engagement in CBT were compared as predictors of 12- and 18-month outcomes for patients being treated for anxiety disorders with CBT (with or without concurrent pharmacotherapy) in primary care settings as part of a randomized controlled effectiveness trial of the Coordinated Anxiety Learning and Management (CALM) intervention. Measures of dose (attendance, exposure completion) and engagement in CBT (homework adherence, commitment) were collected throughout treatment, and blinded follow-up phone assessments of outcome measures (12-item Brief Symptom Inventory, Patient Health Questionnaire 8, Sheehan Disability Scale) were completed at 12 and 18 months. Propensity score weighting controlled for baseline differences in demographics and symptom severity between patients with high and low dose and engagement. These analyses included the 439 patients who selected CBT as treatment modality.

RESULTS

Completing exposures, having high attendance, and being more adherent to completing homework predicted better outcomes across all measures at 12 and 18 months, and high CBT commitment predicted better outcomes on all measures at 18 months.

CONCLUSIONS

This study found that higher treatment dose and patient engagement in CBT for anxiety disorders were stable and robust predictors of greater reductions in anxiety symptoms, depression symptoms, and functional disability.

摘要

目的

本研究探讨了认知行为疗法(CBT)中治疗剂量和患者参与度作为焦虑障碍治疗结果的预测因素。

方法

将 CBT 中的高治疗剂量和高患者参与度与低治疗剂量和低患者参与度进行比较,作为在初级保健环境中使用 CBT(伴有或不伴有同时进行的药物治疗)治疗焦虑障碍患者的 12 个月和 18 个月结果的预测因素,这是协调焦虑学习和管理(CALM)干预措施的一项随机对照有效性试验的一部分。在治疗过程中收集了剂量(出勤率、暴露完成情况)和 CBT 参与度(家庭作业坚持度、承诺)的测量值,在 12 个月和 18 个月时通过盲法随访电话评估结果测量值(12 项Brief Symptom Inventory、Patient Health Questionnaire 8、Sheehan Disability Scale)。采用倾向评分加权法控制了高剂量和高参与度患者与低剂量和低参与度患者之间的基线人口统计学和症状严重程度差异。这些分析包括选择 CBT 作为治疗方式的 439 名患者。

结果

完成暴露、高出勤率和更坚持完成家庭作业,可预测在 12 个月和 18 个月时所有测量指标的结果更好,CBT 承诺度高可预测在 18 个月时所有测量指标的结果更好。

结论

本研究发现,在焦虑障碍的 CBT 中,更高的治疗剂量和患者参与度是焦虑症状、抑郁症状和功能障碍减少的稳定且强大的预测因素。

相似文献

1
Who gets the most out of cognitive behavioral therapy for anxiety disorders? The role of treatment dose and patient engagement.
J Consult Clin Psychol. 2013 Aug;81(4):639-649. doi: 10.1037/a0033403. Epub 2013 Jun 10.
2
Treatment engagement and response to CBT among Latinos with anxiety disorders in primary care.
J Consult Clin Psychol. 2014 Jun;82(3):392-403. doi: 10.1037/a0036365. Epub 2014 Mar 24.
5
Predictors of CBT outcome in older adults with GAD.
J Anxiety Disord. 2014 Dec;28(8):845-50. doi: 10.1016/j.janxdis.2014.09.012. Epub 2014 Oct 5.
6
Long-term outcome of cognitive behaviour therapy clinical trials in central Scotland.
Health Technol Assess. 2005 Nov;9(42):1-174. doi: 10.3310/hta9420.
7
Child and Adolescent Adherence With Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Anxiety: Predictors and Associations With Outcomes.
J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol. 2019;48(sup1):S215-S226. doi: 10.1080/15374416.2017.1310046. Epub 2017 Apr 27.
8
Changes in self-efficacy and outcome expectancy as predictors of anxiety outcomes from the CALM study.
Depress Anxiety. 2014 Aug;31(8):678-89. doi: 10.1002/da.22256. Epub 2014 Mar 11.
9
Therapist-supported Internet cognitive behavioural therapy for anxiety disorders in adults.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Mar 5(3):CD011565. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011565.

引用本文的文献

8

本文引用的文献

1
The Efficacy of Cognitive Behavioral Therapy: A Review of Meta-analyses.
Cognit Ther Res. 2012 Oct 1;36(5):427-440. doi: 10.1007/s10608-012-9476-1. Epub 2012 Jul 31.
2
A review of studies concerning treatment adherence of patients with anxiety disorders.
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2011;5:427-39. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S23439. Epub 2011 Aug 23.
3
Cognitive-behavioral therapy for geriatric compulsive hoarding.
Behav Res Ther. 2011 Oct;49(10):689-94. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2011.07.002. Epub 2011 Jul 13.
4
Training primary care staff to deliver a computer-assisted cognitive-behavioral therapy program for anxiety disorders.
Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2011 Jul-Aug;33(4):336-42. doi: 10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2011.04.011. Epub 2011 Jun 8.
5
Cognitive behavior therapy in medication non-responders with obsessive-compulsive disorder: a prospective 1-year follow-up study.
J Anxiety Disord. 2011 Oct;25(7):939-45. doi: 10.1016/j.janxdis.2011.05.007. Epub 2011 Jun 1.
6
Disorder-specific impact of coordinated anxiety learning and management treatment for anxiety disorders in primary care.
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2011 Apr;68(4):378-88. doi: 10.1001/archgenpsychiatry.2011.25.
7
The Relationship Between Homework Compliance and Therapy Outcomes: An Updated Meta-Analysis.
Cognit Ther Res. 2010 Oct;34(5):429-438. doi: 10.1007/s10608-010-9297-z. Epub 2010 Feb 6.
8
Comorbidity and the treatment of principal anxiety disorders in a naturalistic sample.
Behav Ther. 2010 Sep;41(3):296-305. doi: 10.1016/j.beth.2009.09.002. Epub 2010 Feb 1.
9
Measuring homework completion in behavioral activation.
Behav Modif. 2010 Jul;34(4):310-29. doi: 10.1177/0145445510373384.
10
Is cognitive-behavioral therapy more effective than other therapies? A meta-analytic review.
Clin Psychol Rev. 2010 Aug;30(6):710-20. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2010.05.003. Epub 2010 May 25.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验