Philip Keir, Richardson Ruth, Cohen Maurice
Royal Free London NHS Foundation, UK.
Br J Nurs. 2013;22(10):570-4. doi: 10.12968/bjon.2013.22.10.570.
the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) (2007) states that 'respiratory rate is the best marker of a sick patient and is the first observation that will indicate a problem or deterioration in condition'. It is therefore crucial that staff are confident that respiratory rates are recorded accurately.
to assess perceptions of clinical staff regarding methods of assessment and reliability of respiratory rate recordings in observation charts.
we developed a questionnaire using best practice guidelines. Some 41 ward-based clinical staff completed the questionnaires.
confidence in the reliability of recordings is very low. Clinical staff think recordings are often estimated with no formal measurement, with 'perceived lack of time' being the most commonly cited explanation for inappropriate assessment.
essential clinical information is not being used, as clinical staff lack confidence that it has been assessed correctly. Furthermore, inaccurate recordings could be actively misleading clinical care.
英国国家卫生与临床优化研究所(NICE)(2007年)指出,“呼吸频率是患者病情的最佳指标,也是表明问题或病情恶化的首要观察指标”。因此,工作人员确信呼吸频率记录准确无误至关重要。
评估临床工作人员对观察表中呼吸频率评估方法及记录可靠性的看法。
我们依据最佳实践指南编制了一份问卷。约41名病房临床工作人员完成了问卷。
对记录可靠性的信心非常低。临床工作人员认为记录通常是估计的,没有进行正式测量,“感觉时间不够”是对评估不当最常给出的解释。
由于临床工作人员对已正确评估基本临床信息缺乏信心,这些信息未得到利用。此外,不准确的记录可能会对临床护理产生误导。