Haematologica. 2013 Oct;98(10):1563-70. doi: 10.3324/haematol.2013.088377. Epub 2013 Jun 10.
The prognosis for fit patients with mantle cell lymphoma has improved with intensive strategies. Currently, the role of maintenance/consolidation approaches is being tested as relapses continue to appear. In this trial we evaluated the feasibility, safety and efficacy of rituximab-hyperCVAD alternating with rituximab-methotrexate-cytarabine followed by consolidation with (90)Y-ibritumomab tiuxetan. Patients received six cycles followed by a single dose of (90)Y-ibritumomab tiuxetan. Thirty patients were enrolled; their median age was 59 years. Twenty-four patients finished the induction treatment, 23 achieved complete remission (77%, 95% confidence interval 60-93) and one patient had progressive disease (3%). Eighteen patients (60%), all in complete remission, received consolidation therapy. In the intent-to-treat population, failure-free, progression-free and overall survival rates at 4 years were 40% (95% confidence interval 20.4-59.6), 52% (95% confidence interval 32.4-71.6) and 81% (95% confidence interval 67.28-94.72), respectively. For patients who received consolidation, failure-free and overall survival rates were 55% (95% confidence interval 31.48-78.52) and 87% (95% confidence interval 70-100), respectively. Hematologic toxicity was significant during induction and responsible for one death (3.3%). After consolidation, grade 3-4 neutropenia and thrombocytopenia were observed in 72% and 83% of patients, with a median duration of 5 and 12 weeks, respectively. Six (20%) patients died, three due to secondary malignancies (myelodysplastic syndrome and bladder and rectum carcinomas). In conclusion, in our experience, rituximab-hyperCVAD alternated with rituximab-methotrexate-cytarabine and followed by consolidation with (90)Y-ibritumomab tiuxetan was efficacious although less feasible than expected. The unacceptable toxicity observed, especially secondary malignancies, advise against the use of this strategy.
clinical.gov identifier: NCT2005-004400-37.
随着强化策略的应用,适合的套细胞淋巴瘤患者的预后已得到改善。目前,作为复发继续出现的一种手段,维持/巩固治疗方法的作用正在被检验。在这项试验中,我们评估了利妥昔单抗-高剂量环磷酰胺、阿霉素、长春新碱(hyperCVAD)与利妥昔单抗-甲氨蝶呤-阿糖胞苷交替应用,随后用(90)Y-依鲁替尼替妥昔单抗进行巩固治疗的可行性、安全性和有效性。患者接受 6 个周期的治疗,随后给予单次(90)Y-依鲁替尼替妥昔单抗剂量。共纳入 30 例患者,中位年龄 59 岁。24 例患者完成诱导治疗,23 例患者达到完全缓解(77%,95%置信区间 60-93),1 例患者出现疾病进展(3%)。18 例(60%)患者接受巩固治疗,所有患者均处于完全缓解状态。在意向治疗人群中,4 年时无失败、无进展和总生存率分别为 40%(95%置信区间 20.4-59.6)、52%(95%置信区间 32.4-71.6)和 81%(95%置信区间 67.28-94.72)。对于接受巩固治疗的患者,无失败和总生存率分别为 55%(95%置信区间 31.48-78.52)和 87%(95%置信区间 70-100)。诱导治疗期间血液学毒性显著,导致 1 例死亡(3.3%)。巩固治疗后,72%和 83%的患者分别出现 3-4 级中性粒细胞减少和血小板减少,中位持续时间分别为 5 周和 12 周。6 例(20%)患者死亡,其中 3 例死于继发性恶性肿瘤(骨髓增生异常综合征和膀胱、直肠癌)。总之,根据我们的经验,利妥昔单抗-高剂量环磷酰胺、阿霉素、长春新碱(hyperCVAD)与利妥昔单抗-甲氨蝶呤-阿糖胞苷交替应用,随后用(90)Y-依鲁替尼替妥昔单抗进行巩固治疗是有效的,但不如预期的那样可行。观察到的不可接受的毒性,特别是继发性恶性肿瘤,不建议使用这种策略。
clinical.gov 标识符:NCT2005-004400-37。