Public Health Sciences Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Genet Epidemiol. 2013 Sep;37(6):529-38. doi: 10.1002/gepi.21736. Epub 2013 Jun 11.
For studies of genetically complex diseases, many association methods have been developed to analyze rare variants. When variant calls are missing, naïve implementation of rare variant association (RVA) methods may lead to inflated type I error rates as well as a reduction in power. To overcome these problems, we developed extensions for four commonly used RVA tests. Data from the National Heart Lung and Blood Institute-Exome Sequencing Project were used to demonstrate that missing variant calls can lead to increased false-positive rates and that the extended RVA methods control type I error without reducing power. We suggest a combined strategy of data filtering based on variant and sample level missing genotypes along with implementation of these extended RVA tests.
对于遗传复杂疾病的研究,已经开发出许多关联方法来分析罕见变异。当变异调用缺失时,简单地实现罕见变异关联 (RVA) 方法可能会导致 I 型错误率膨胀以及功效降低。为了克服这些问题,我们为四种常用的 RVA 测试开发了扩展。使用来自国家心肺血液研究所外显子组测序项目的数据表明,缺失的变异调用可能会导致假阳性率增加,而扩展的 RVA 方法在不降低功效的情况下控制 I 型错误。我们建议结合基于变异和样本水平缺失基因型的数据过滤策略以及这些扩展的 RVA 测试的实施。