使用改良的拉萨特临床判断评分量表进行模拟评估。
Simulation evaluation using a modified Lasater Clinical Judgment Rubric.
作者信息
Ashcraft Alyce S, Opton Laura, Bridges Ruth Ann, Caballero Sandra, Veesart Amanda, Weaver Christy
机构信息
Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, School of Nursing, Lubbock, Texas, USA.
出版信息
Nurs Educ Perspect. 2013 Mar-Apr;34(2):122-6. doi: 10.5480/1536-5026-34.2.122.
AIM
The purpose of this study was to describe the process of evaluating senior nursing students in the simulation laboratory using a modified Lasater Clinical Judgment Rubric (LCJR).
BACKGROUND
The LCJR is a clinical evaluation tool used to measure outcomes in simulated learning settings. The LCJR was revised to provide numeric grading and clarity regarding expectations of clinical competency.
METHOD
The study was conducted over two years with students enrolled in their final bachelor of science in nursing semester (Phase I, n = 86; Phase 2, n = 102) using high-fidelity simulation.
RESULTS
The modified rubric measured student performance more holistically than a procedural checklist and provided objective criteria for evaluation.
CONCLUSION
A well-constructed rubric provides a mechanism to evaluate student performance in simulation by focusing on clinical reasoning essential for patient safety and allowing numeric evaluation of performance.
目的
本研究旨在描述使用改良版拉塞特临床判断评分量表（LCJR）在模拟实验室中评估高年级护理专业学生的过程。
背景
LCJR是一种临床评估工具，用于衡量模拟学习环境中的结果。LCJR经过修订，以提供数字评分并明确临床能力的期望。
方法
该研究历时两年，对护理学理学学士最后一学期的学生（第一阶段，n = 86；第二阶段，n = 102）使用高保真模拟进行。
结果
改良后的评分量表比程序检查表更全面地衡量了学生的表现，并提供了客观的评估标准。
结论
一个精心构建的评分量表提供了一种机制，通过关注对患者安全至关重要的临床推理并允许对表现进行数字评估，来评估模拟环境中学生的表现。
Zotero 插件