Faculty of Geosciences, University of Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. 2013;53(9):917-28. doi: 10.1080/10408398.2011.573886.
While much has been published on the advantages of organic agriculture, less has addressed its potentials and challenges to fight undernourishment in developing countries. This article aims at reviewing the main potentials and challenges of this approach when dealing with "undernourishment" as a multifaceted concept in developing countries. Accordingly, 2 main issues of the concept which are "food security" and "food safety" are discussed in the context of both developed and developing countries to understand their different food policies' priorities. Next, the main potentials, challenges and tradeoffs of the organic approach are analyzed to understand whether the approach is capable to provide a secure or a safe food-production system which can meet the food policy priorities in developing countries. With respect to food security, the article concludes that conventional and biotechnological approaches still produce higher yields than organic agriculture. However, considering the many advantages of organic agriculture, it can in a long run, be more conducive than now to meet food security. Thus, conventional approach is still needed to feed the hungers in developing countries [corrected]. Accordingly, the article emphasizes on the importance of providing farmers in developing countries with the possibility of implementing different approaches. Therefore, policy makers should be aware of a realistic and gradual transition from the other approaches to the organic that should be projected only in "long run," and after conducting a series of risk assessment studies on the bases of both "crop-case" and "region-case."
虽然已经有很多关于有机农业优势的出版物,但对于发展中国家如何利用其潜力应对营养不良问题的研究却相对较少。本文旨在探讨在处理发展中国家“营养不良”这一多维度概念时,这种方法的主要潜力和挑战。因此,本文在发达国家和发展中国家的背景下讨论了“粮食安全”和“食品安全”这两个概念的主要问题,以了解它们不同的粮食政策优先事项。接下来,分析了有机方法的主要潜力、挑战和权衡取舍,以了解该方法是否能够提供一个安全或安全的粮食生产系统,以满足发展中国家的粮食政策优先事项。就粮食安全而言,本文得出的结论是,传统和生物技术方法的产量仍然高于有机农业。然而,考虑到有机农业的许多优势,从长远来看,它可能比现在更有利于满足粮食安全。因此,在发展中国家仍然需要传统方法来解决饥饿问题。因此,本文强调了为发展中国家的农民提供实施不同方法的可能性的重要性。因此,政策制定者应该意识到从其他方法向有机方法的现实和渐进的转变,并且只有在“长期”之后,在对“作物案例”和“区域案例”进行一系列风险评估研究的基础上,才应该进行这种转变。