Suppr超能文献

主动脉瓣狭窄患者纵向应变与症状之间的关系。

Relationship between longitudinal strain and symptomatic status in aortic stenosis.

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Bichat Hospital, Paris, France.

出版信息

J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2013 Aug;26(8):868-74. doi: 10.1016/j.echo.2013.05.004. Epub 2013 Jun 13.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Global longitudinal strain (GLS) and basal longitudinal strain (BLS) assessed using two-dimensional speckle-tracking imaging have been proposed as subtle markers of left ventricular (LV) systolic dysfunction with potential prognostic value in patients with aortic stenosis (AS). The aim of this study was to evaluate the relationship between longitudinal strain and symptomatic status in patients with AS.

METHODS

GLS and BLS were measured in 171 patients with pure, isolated, at least mild AS prospectively enrolled at two institutions. The population was divided into four groups: asymptomatic nonsevere AS (n = 55), asymptomatic severe AS with preserved LV ejection fraction (LVEF; ≥50%) (n = 37), symptomatic severe AS with preserved LVEF (n = 60), and severe AS with reduced LVEF (<50%) (n = 19).

RESULTS

GLS was significantly different among the four groups (P < .0001), but the difference was due mainly to patients with reduced LVEFs. In addition, there was an important overlap among the groups, and in multivariate analysis, after adjustment for age, gender, AS severity, and LVEF, GLS was not an independent predictor of symptomatic status (P = .07). BLS was also significantly different among the four groups (P < .0001) but in contrast was independently associated with symptomatic status (P < .0001). However, as for GLS, there was an important overlap between groups and differences were close to intraobserver or interobserver variability (1.3 ± 1.1% and 2.0 ± 1.6%, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

In this prospective multicenter cohort of patients with wide ranges of AS severity, symptoms, and LVEFs, BLS but not GLS was independently associated with symptomatic status. However, there was an important overlap among groups, and differences were close to measurements' reproducibility, raising caution regarding the use of longitudinal strain, at least as a single criterion, in the decision-making process for patients with severe asymptomatic AS.

摘要

背景

二维斑点追踪成像评估的整体纵向应变(GLS)和基底纵向应变(BLS)已被提出作为左心室(LV)收缩功能障碍的细微标志物,在主动脉瓣狭窄(AS)患者中有潜在的预后价值。本研究的目的是评估 AS 患者的纵向应变与症状状态之间的关系。

方法

前瞻性地在两个机构共纳入 171 例单纯、孤立、至少轻度 AS 的患者,测量 GLS 和 BLS。人群分为四组:无症状非重度 AS(n=55)、无症状重度 AS 且左心室射血分数(LVEF)保留(≥50%)(n=37)、有症状重度 AS 且 LVEF 保留(n=60)和重度 AS 且 LVEF 降低(<50%)(n=19)。

结果

四组间 GLS 差异有统计学意义(P<0.0001),但差异主要归因于 LVEF 降低的患者。此外,各组间存在重要重叠,多变量分析显示,在校正年龄、性别、AS 严重程度和 LVEF 后,GLS 不是症状状态的独立预测因子(P=0.07)。四组间 BLS 也有显著差异(P<0.0001),但与症状状态独立相关(P<0.0001)。然而,与 GLS 相似,组间存在重要重叠,差异接近观察者内或观察者间变异性(分别为 1.3±1.1%和 2.0±1.6%)。

结论

在本项前瞻性多中心重度 AS 患者队列中,BLS 而不是 GLS 与症状状态独立相关,但组间存在重要重叠,差异接近测量的可重复性,这使得在决策重度无症状 AS 患者时使用纵向应变(至少作为单一标准)需要谨慎。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验