Suppr超能文献

在急性精神病院,针对反对意见进行法院指令治疗的结果。

Outcomes associated with court-ordered treatment over objection in an acute psychiatric hospital.

机构信息

Zucker Hillside Hospital, 75-59 263rd Street, Glen Oaks, NY 11004, USA.

出版信息

J Am Acad Psychiatry Law. 2013;41(2):236-44.

Abstract

The postdischarge outcomes of court-ordered treatment of acute psychiatric inpatients have not been adequately investigated. We reviewed the medical records of all patients who refused medication for whom a court order was sought during a recent three-year period, and compared this group to control patients who agreed to treatment and a group of patients who transiently refused medication. The principal outcome measures were successful linkage after discharge, readmission within six months of discharge, and transfer to a state hospital. The study group was less likely to link to an aftercare provider, and more likely to be transferred to a state hospital, had poorer insight on admission, had a longer average stay, and was more likely to utilize mandatory outpatient treatment and long-acting injectable medications after discharge. Patients who require court-ordered medication over objection constitute a group that is high risk for nonadherence after discharge and being refractive to treatment.

摘要

院外治疗的出院结局尚未得到充分研究。我们回顾了在最近三年期间,所有拒绝药物治疗且寻求法院命令的住院精神科患者的病历,并将该组与同意治疗的对照组患者和暂时拒绝药物治疗的一组患者进行比较。主要结局指标为出院后的成功联系、出院后六个月内的再入院和转至州立医院。研究组与后续护理提供者联系的可能性较小,更有可能转至州立医院,入院时洞察力较差,平均住院时间较长,出院后更有可能接受强制门诊治疗和长效注射药物治疗。那些反对但需要法院命令药物治疗的患者在出院后不遵医嘱和对治疗产生抵触的风险较高。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验