Suppr超能文献

通过公共政策促进健康饮食:一项对照实验。

Promotion of healthy eating through public policy: a controlled experiment.

机构信息

Departments of Population Health and Medicine, School of Medicine, New York University, New York, New York.

Departments of Population Health and Medicine, School of Medicine, New York University, New York, New York.

出版信息

Am J Prev Med. 2013 Jul;45(1):49-55. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2013.02.023.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

To induce consumers to purchase healthier foods and beverages, some policymakers have suggested special taxes or labels on unhealthy products. The potential of such policies is unknown.

PURPOSE

In a controlled field experiment, researchers tested whether consumers were more likely to purchase healthy products under such policies.

METHODS

From October to December 2011, researchers opened a store at a large hospital that sold a variety of healthier and less-healthy foods and beverages. Purchases (N=3680) were analyzed under five conditions: a baseline with no special labeling or taxation, a 30% tax, highlighting the phrase "less healthy" on the price tag, and combinations of taxation and labeling. Purchases were analyzed in January-July 2012, at the single-item and transaction levels.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference between the various taxation conditions. Consumers were 11 percentage points more likely to purchase a healthier item under a 30% tax (95% CI=7%, 16%, p<0.001) and 6 percentage points more likely under labeling (95% CI=0%, 12%, p=0.04). By product type, consumers switched away from the purchase of less-healthy food under taxation (9 percentage point decrease, p<0.001) and into healthier beverages (6 percentage point increase, p=0.001); there were no effects for labeling. Conditions were associated with the purchase of 11-14 fewer calories (9%-11% in relative terms) and 2 fewer grams of sugar. Results remained significant controlling for all items purchased in a single transaction.

CONCLUSIONS

Taxation may induce consumers to purchase healthier foods and beverages. However, it is unclear whether the 15%-20% tax rates proposed in public policy discussions would be more effective than labeling products as less healthy.

摘要

背景

为了促使消费者购买更健康的食品和饮料,一些政策制定者建议对不健康产品征收特殊税或贴上标签。这些政策的潜力尚不清楚。

目的

在一项对照现场实验中,研究人员测试了消费者在这些政策下是否更有可能购买健康产品。

方法

2011 年 10 月至 12 月期间,研究人员在一家大型医院开设了一家商店,销售各种更健康和不太健康的食品和饮料。在五种条件下分析了购买情况(N=3680):没有特殊标签或征税的基线、30%的税收、在价格标签上突出“不太健康”一词,以及税收和标签的组合。2012 年 1 月至 7 月,在单一项目和交易层面进行了购买分析。

结果

各种税收条件之间没有显著差异。在 30%的税收下,消费者购买更健康产品的可能性增加了 11 个百分点(95%置信区间=7%,16%,p<0.001),在标签下增加了 6 个百分点(95%置信区间=0%,12%,p=0.04)。按产品类型,消费者从税收下购买不太健康的食物转而购买更健康的饮料(减少 9 个百分点,p<0.001);标签则没有影响。条件与购买 11-14 卡路里(相对减少 9%-11%)和 2 克糖有关。在控制单次交易中购买的所有商品的情况下,结果仍然显著。

结论

税收可能会促使消费者购买更健康的食品和饮料。然而,目前尚不清楚公共政策讨论中提出的 15%-20%的税率是否比将产品标记为不太健康更有效。

相似文献

1
Promotion of healthy eating through public policy: a controlled experiment.
Am J Prev Med. 2013 Jul;45(1):49-55. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2013.02.023.
2
Comparison of Sales From Vending Machines With 4 Different Food and Beverage Messages: A Randomized Trial.
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 May 1;7(5):e249438. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.9438.
5
Taxation of sugar sweetened beverages and unhealthy foods: a qualitative study of key opinion leaders' views.
Isr J Health Policy Res. 2018 Jul 31;7(1):43. doi: 10.1186/s13584-018-0240-1.
8
Health Promotion and Healthier Products Increase Vending Purchases: A Randomized Factorial Trial.
J Acad Nutr Diet. 2017 Jul;117(7):1057-1065. doi: 10.1016/j.jand.2016.12.006. Epub 2017 Feb 3.
10

引用本文的文献

2
Hospital-Based Food Environment Interventions to Improve Workforce Dietary Behaviour: A Systematic Literature Review.
Am J Lifestyle Med. 2023 Jul 4;19(4):616-625. doi: 10.1177/15598276231184813. eCollection 2025 May-Jun.
4
Effectiveness of price-reduced meals on purchases among university young adults.
J Nutr Sci. 2021 Oct 29;10:e94. doi: 10.1017/jns.2021.87. eCollection 2021.
5
Impacts of a sugar sweetened beverage tax on body mass index and obesity in Thailand: A modelling study.
PLoS One. 2021 Apr 29;16(4):e0250841. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0250841. eCollection 2021.
7
Taxation of the fat content of foods for reducing their consumption and preventing obesity or other adverse health outcomes.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Sep 11;9(9):CD012415. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012415.pub2.
9
The effect of proportional v. value pricing on fountain drink purchases: results from a field experiment.
Public Health Nutr. 2018 Sep;21(13):2518-2522. doi: 10.1017/S1368980018001143. Epub 2018 May 15.
10
Nutritional labelling for healthier food or non-alcoholic drink purchasing and consumption.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Feb 27;2(2):CD009315. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009315.pub2.

本文引用的文献

1
Talking about sugar sweetened-beverage taxes: will actions speak louder than words?
Am J Prev Med. 2013 Feb;44(2):194-5. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2012.11.002.
2
Taxes on sugar-sweetened beverages: results from a 2011 national public opinion survey.
Am J Prev Med. 2013 Feb;44(2):158-63. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2012.09.065.
3
Food pricing strategies, population diets, and non-communicable disease: a systematic review of simulation studies.
PLoS Med. 2012;9(12):e1001353. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001353. Epub 2012 Dec 11.
4
The impact of price discounts and calorie messaging on beverage consumption: a multi-site field study.
Prev Med. 2012 Dec;55(6):629-33. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2012.10.009. Epub 2012 Oct 13.
5
Reducing prenatal smoking: the role of state policies.
Am J Prev Med. 2012 Jul;43(1):34-40. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2012.02.030.
6
Taxing unhealthy food and drinks to improve health.
BMJ. 2012 May 15;344:e2931. doi: 10.1136/bmj.e2931.
8
Experimental research on the relation between food price changes and food-purchasing patterns: a targeted review.
Am J Clin Nutr. 2012 Apr;95(4):789-809. doi: 10.3945/ajcn.111.024380. Epub 2012 Feb 29.
9
A penny-per-ounce tax on sugar-sweetened beverages would cut health and cost burdens of diabetes.
Health Aff (Millwood). 2012 Jan;31(1):199-207. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2011.0410.
10
European nations launch tax attack on unhealthy foods.
CMAJ. 2011 Nov 22;183(17):E1229-30. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.109-4031. Epub 2011 Oct 24.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验