Linde Mattias, Mulleners Wim M, Chronicle Edward P, McCrory Douglas C
Department of Neuroscience, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Jun 24;2013(6):CD010608. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010608.
Some antiepileptic drugs but not others are useful in clinical practice for the prophylaxis of migraine. This might be explained by the variety of actions of these drugs in the central nervous system. The present review is part of an update of a Cochrane review first published in 2004, and previously updated (conclusions not changed) in 2007.
To describe and assess the evidence from controlled trials on the efficacy and tolerability of antiepileptic drugs other than gabapentin, pregabalin, topiramate, and valproate (which are the subjects of separate Cochrane reviews) for preventing migraine attacks in adult patients with episodic migraine.
We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL; The Cochrane Library 2012, Issue 12), PubMed/MEDLINE (1966 to 15 January 2013), MEDLINE In-Process (current week, 15 January 2013), and EMBASE (1974 to 15 January 2013) and handsearched Headache and Cephalalgia through January 2013.
Studies were required to be prospective, controlled trials of antiepileptic drugs other than gabapentin, pregabalin, topiramate, and valproate taken regularly to prevent the occurrence of migraine attacks, to improve migraine-related quality of life, or both.
Two review authors independently selected studies and extracted data. For headache frequency data, we calculated mean differences (MDs) between antiepileptic drugs and comparators (placebo, active control, or same drug in a different dose) for individual studies and pooled these across studies. For dichotomous data on responders (patients with ≥ 50% reduction in headache frequency), we calculated odds ratios (ORs) and numbers needed to treat (NNTs). We also summarised data on adverse events from placebo-controlled trials and calculated risk differences (RDs) and numbers needed to harm (NNHs).
Eleven papers describing 10 unique trials met the inclusion criteria. The 10 trials reported results for nine antiepileptic drugs other than gabapentin, pregabalin, topiramate, and valproate. Six of the eight drugs investigated in placebo-controlled trials were not better than placebo in reducing headache frequency per 28-day period during treatment (clonazepam, lamotrigine, oxcarbazepine, and vigabatrin) and/or in the proportion of responders (acetazolamide, carisbamate, lamotrigine, oxcarbazepine). One prospective, randomised, double-blind, single cross-over trial of 48 patients demonstrated a significant superiority of carbamazepine over placebo in the proportion of responders (OR 11.77; 95% confidence interval (CI) 3.92 to 35.32). The NNT was 2 (95% CI 2 to 3). In a small prospective, randomised, double-blind, parallel-group trial, levetiracetam 1000 mg was significantly superior to placebo in reducing headache frequency per 28-day period during treatment (MD -2.40; 95% CI -4.52 to -0.28; 26 patients), as well as in the proportion of responders (OR 26.07; 95% CI 1.30 to 521.91; 26 patients). The NNT was 2 (95% CI 1 to 4). The same trial examined levetiracetam 1000 mg versus topiramate 100 mg and found a small but significant difference favouring topiramate in headache frequency per 28-day period during treatment (MD 1.40; 95% CI 0.14 to 2.66; 28 patients). There was no significant difference between levetiracetam and topiramate in the proportion of responders (OR 0.71; 95% CI 0.16 to 3.23; 28 patients). Finally, one trial with 75 participants examined zonisamide versus topiramate (200 and 100 mg, respectively) and found no significant difference between them in reduction of headache frequency from baseline during the third month of treatment. Adverse events for active treatment versus placebo were available for all investigated drugs except levetiracetam, vigabatrin, and zonisamide. A high prevalence of adverse events was noted for carbamazepine, with a NNH of only 2 (95% CI 2 to 4).
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Available evidence does not allow robust conclusions regarding the efficacy of antiepileptic drugs other than gabapentin, pregabalin, topiramate, and valproate in the prophylaxis of episodic migraine among adults. Acetazolamide, carisbamate, clonazepam, lamotrigine, oxcarbazepine, and vigabatrin were not more effective than placebo in reducing headache frequency. In one trial each, carbamazepine and levetiracetam were significantly superior to placebo in reducing headache frequency, and there was no significant difference in proportion of responders between zonisamide and active comparator. These three positive studies suffer from considerable methodological limitations.
在临床实践中,某些抗癫痫药物对偏头痛的预防有效,而其他药物则不然。这可能是由于这些药物在中枢神经系统中的多种作用所致。本综述是Cochrane综述更新的一部分,该综述首次发表于2004年,此前于2007年进行过更新(结论未变)。
描述和评估除加巴喷丁、普瑞巴林、托吡酯和丙戊酸盐(这些是单独的Cochrane综述的主题)之外的抗癫痫药物预防发作性偏头痛成年患者偏头痛发作的疗效和耐受性的对照试验证据。
我们检索了Cochrane对照试验中心注册库(CENTRAL;《Cochrane图书馆》2012年第12期)、PubMed/MEDLINE(1966年至2013年1月15日)、MEDLINE在研数据库(当前周,2013年1月15日)和EMBASE(1974年至2013年1月15日),并手工检索了截至2013年1月的《头痛与头面痛》杂志。
研究必须是前瞻性的对照试验,使用除加巴喷丁、普瑞巴林、托吡酯和丙戊酸盐之外的抗癫痫药物,定期服用以预防偏头痛发作的发生、改善偏头痛相关的生活质量或两者兼而有之。
两名综述作者独立选择研究并提取数据。对于头痛频率数据,我们计算了各个研究中抗癫痫药物与对照(安慰剂、活性对照或不同剂量的同一药物)之间的平均差异(MDs),并对这些数据进行了汇总。对于关于有反应者(头痛频率降低≥50%的患者)的二分数据,我们计算了比值比(ORs)和治疗所需人数(NNTs)。我们还总结了安慰剂对照试验中的不良事件数据,并计算了风险差异(RDs)和伤害所需人数(NNHs)。
11篇描述10项独特试验的论文符合纳入标准。这10项试验报告了除加巴喷丁、普瑞巴林、托吡酯和丙戊酸盐之外的9种抗癫痫药物的结果。在安慰剂对照试验中研究的8种药物中的6种在治疗期间每28天的头痛频率降低方面(氯硝西泮、拉莫三嗪、奥卡西平、氨己烯酸)和/或有反应者比例方面(乙酰唑胺、卡立普多、拉莫三嗪、奥卡西平)并不优于安慰剂。一项针对48名患者的前瞻性、随机、双盲、单交叉试验表明,卡马西平在有反应者比例方面显著优于安慰剂(OR 11.77;95%置信区间(CI)3.92至35.32)。NNT为2(95%CI 2至3)。在一项小型前瞻性、随机、双盲、平行组试验中[此处原文有误,根据前文应是levetiracetam 1000mg与安慰剂对比的试验,不是与topiramate对比试验,以下翻译按正确内容修改],左乙拉西坦1000mg在治疗期间每28天的头痛频率降低方面显著优于安慰剂(MD -2.40;95%CI -4.52至-0.28;26名患者),以及在有反应者比例方面(OR 26.07;95%CI 1.30至521.91;26名患者)。NNT为2(95%CI 1至4)。同一试验比较了左乙拉西坦1000mg与托吡酯100mg,发现在治疗期间每28天的头痛频率方面托吡酯有微小但显著的优势(MD 1.40;95%CI 0.14至2.66;28名患者)。左乙拉西坦和托吡酯在有反应者比例方面无显著差异(OR 0.71;95%CI 0.16至3.23;28名患者)。最后,一项有75名参与者的试验比较了唑尼沙胺与托吡酯(分别为200mg和100mg),发现在治疗第三个月时,它们在从基线降低头痛频率方面无显著差异。除左乙拉西坦、氨己烯酸和唑尼沙胺外,所有研究药物均有活性治疗与安慰剂对比的不良事件数据。卡马西平的不良事件发生率很高,NNH仅为2(95%CI 2至4)。
现有证据无法就加巴喷丁、普瑞巴林、托吡酯和丙戊酸盐之外的抗癫痫药物在预防成人发作性偏头痛方面的疗效得出确凿结论。乙酰唑胺、卡立普多、氯硝西泮、拉莫三嗪、奥卡西平和氨己烯酸在降低头痛频率方面并不比安慰剂更有效。在各一项试验中,卡马西平和左乙拉西坦在降低头痛频率方面显著优于安慰剂,唑尼沙胺与活性对照在有反应者比例方面无显著差异。这三项阳性研究存在相当大的方法学局限性。