Suppr超能文献

计算机断层血管造影和对比增强磁共振血管造影在严重肢体缺血和间歇性跛行患者中的诊断性能:系统评价和荟萃分析

Diagnostic performance of computed tomography angiography and contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography in patients with critical limb ischaemia and intermittent claudication: systematic review and meta-analysis.

作者信息

Jens Sjoerd, Koelemay Mark J W, Reekers Jim A, Bipat Shandra

机构信息

Department of Radiology, Academic Medical Center, Room G1-229, Meibergdreef 9, 1105, AZ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands,

出版信息

Eur Radiol. 2013 Nov;23(11):3104-14. doi: 10.1007/s00330-013-2933-8. Epub 2013 Jun 26.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the diagnostic performance of computed tomography angiography (CTA) and contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography (CE-MRA) in detecting haemodynamically significant arterial stenosis or occlusion in patients with critical limb ischaemia (CLI) or intermittent claudication (IC).

METHODS

Medline and Embase were searched for studies comparing CTA or CE-MRA with digital subtraction angiography as a reference standard, including patients with CLI or IC. Outcome measures were aortotibial arterial stenosis of more than 50 % or occlusion. Methodological quality of studies was assessed using QUADAS.

RESULTS

Out of 5,693 articles, 12 CTA and 30 CE-MRA studies were included, respectively evaluating 673 and 1,404 participants. Summary estimates of sensitivity and specificity were respectively 96 % (95 % CI, 93-98 %) and 95 % (95 % CI, 92-97 %) for CTA, and 93 % (95 % CI, 91-95 %) and 94 % (95 % CI, 93-96 %) for CE-MRA. Regression analysis showed that the prevalence of CLI in individual studies was not an independent predictor of sensitivity and specificity for either technique. Methodological quality of studies was moderate to good.

CONCLUSION

CTA and CE-MRA are accurate techniques for evaluating disease severity of aortotibial arteries in patients with CLI or IC. No significant differences in the diagnostic performance of the two techniques between patients with CLI and IC were found.

KEY POINTS

• Computed tomography and contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography can both demonstrate arterial disease. • CTA and CE-MRA can both accurately evaluate arteries in peripheral arterial disease. • Diagnostic performances of critical limb ischaemia and intermittent claudication are not different. • Separate imaging technique of tibial arteries by CE-MRA is preferred. • CTA and CE-MRA can distinguish confidently between high-grade stenoses and occlusions.

摘要

目的

评估计算机断层血管造影(CTA)和对比增强磁共振血管造影(CE-MRA)在检测严重肢体缺血(CLI)或间歇性跛行(IC)患者血流动力学显著的动脉狭窄或闭塞方面的诊断性能。

方法

检索Medline和Embase,查找将CTA或CE-MRA与数字减影血管造影作为参考标准进行比较的研究,纳入CLI或IC患者。观察指标为主动脉-胫动脉狭窄超过50%或闭塞。采用QUADAS评估研究的方法学质量。

结果

在5693篇文章中,分别纳入了12项CTA研究和30项CE-MRA研究,分别评估了673名和1404名参与者。CTA的敏感性和特异性汇总估计值分别为96%(95%CI,93-98%)和95%(95%CI,92-97%),CE-MRA的敏感性和特异性汇总估计值分别为93%(95%CI,91-95%)和94%(95%CI,93-96%)。回归分析表明,各研究中CLI的患病率并非这两种技术敏感性和特异性的独立预测因素。研究的方法学质量为中等至良好。

结论

CTA和CE-MRA是评估CLI或IC患者主动脉-胫动脉疾病严重程度的准确技术。未发现CLI和IC患者中这两种技术的诊断性能存在显著差异。

要点

• 计算机断层扫描和对比增强磁共振血管造影均可显示动脉疾病。• CTA和CE-MRA均可准确评估外周动脉疾病中的动脉。• 严重肢体缺血和间歇性跛行的诊断性能无差异。• 首选CE-MRA对胫动脉进行单独成像技术。• CTA和CE-MRA能够可靠地区分高度狭窄和闭塞。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验