Insaf Respiratory Research Institute, Wiesbaden, Germany.
COPD. 2013 Aug;10(4):511-22. doi: 10.3109/15412555.2013.814626. Epub 2013 Jul 2.
This randomized, double-blind, Phase IIIb study evaluated the 24-hour bronchodilatory efficacy of aclidinium bromide versus placebo and tiotropium in patients with moderate-to-severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).
Patients received aclidinium 400 μg twice daily (morning and evening), tiotropium 18 μg once daily (morning), or placebo for 6 weeks. The primary endpoint was change from baseline in forced expiratory volume in 1 second area under the curve for the 24-hour period post-morning dose (FEV1 AUC0-24) at week 6. Secondary and additional endpoints included FEV1 AUC12-24, COPD symptoms (EXAcerbations of chronic pulmonary disease Tool-Respiratory Symptoms [E-RS] total score and additional symptoms questionnaire), and safety.
Overall, 414 patients were randomized and treated (FEV1 1.63 L [55.8% predicted]). Compared with placebo, FEV1 AUC0-24 and FEV1 AUC12-24 were significantly increased from baseline with aclidinium (∆ = 150 mL and 160 mL, respectively; p < 0.0001) and tiotropium (∆ = 140 mL and 123 mL, respectively; p < 0.0001) at week 6. Significant improvements in E-RS total scores over 6 weeks were numerically greater with aclidinium (p < 0.0001) than tiotropium (p < 0.05) versus placebo. Only aclidinium significantly reduced the severity of early-morning cough, wheeze, shortness of breath, and phlegm, and of nighttime symptoms versus placebo (p < 0.05). Adverse-event (AE) incidence (28%) was similar between treatments. Few anticholinergic AEs (<1.5%) or serious AEs (<3%) occurred in any group.
Aclidinium provided significant 24-hour bronchodilation versus placebo from day 1 with comparable efficacy to tiotropium after 6 weeks. Improvements in COPD symptoms were consistently numerically greater with aclidinium versus tiotropium. Aclidinium was generally well tolerated.
这项随机、双盲、IIIb 期研究评估了在中重度慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)患者中,与安慰剂和噻托溴铵相比,每日两次给予阿布昔利定溴化物 400μg 的 24 小时支气管扩张疗效。
患者接受阿布昔利定 400μg 每日两次(早晚)、噻托溴铵 18μg 每日一次(早上)或安慰剂治疗 6 周。主要终点是第 6 周晨剂量后 24 小时内用力呼气量 1 秒(FEV1)面积曲线下的变化(FEV1 AUC0-24)。次要和附加终点包括 FEV1 AUC12-24、COPD 症状(慢性肺部疾病加重工具-呼吸症状[E-RS]总分和附加症状问卷)和安全性。
共有 414 名患者随机分组并接受治疗(FEV1 1.63L[55.8%预测值])。与安慰剂相比,阿布昔利定(分别增加了 150mL 和 160mL;p<0.0001)和噻托溴铵(分别增加了 140mL 和 123mL;p<0.0001)在第 6 周时 FEV1 AUC0-24 和 FEV1 AUC12-24 自基线显著增加。6 周时,E-RS 总分的显著改善,阿布昔利定(p<0.0001)较噻托溴铵(p<0.05)与安慰剂相比数值更大。只有阿布昔利定可显著降低清晨咳嗽、气喘、呼吸急促和咳痰的严重程度,以及夜间症状的严重程度(p<0.05)。与治疗相关的不良事件(AE)发生率(28%)在各治疗组之间相似。各组均很少发生抗胆碱能 AEs(<1.5%)或严重 AEs(<3%)。
从第 1 天开始,阿布昔利定与安慰剂相比提供了显著的 24 小时支气管扩张作用,6 周后与噻托溴铵的疗效相当。与噻托溴铵相比,阿布昔利定始终能更显著地改善 COPD 症状。阿布昔利定通常具有良好的耐受性。