Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine Department of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois 60611, USA.
JAMA. 2013 Jul 3;310(1):57-65. doi: 10.1001/jama.2013.7231.
Clinical practice guidelines state there is insufficient evidence to support advising patients with peripheral artery disease (PAD) to participate in a home-based walking exercise program.
To determine whether a home-based walking exercise program that uses a group-mediated cognitive behavioral intervention, incorporating both group support and self-regulatory skills, can improve functional performance compared with a health education control group in patients with PAD with and without intermittent claudication.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PATIENTS: Randomized controlled clinical trial of 194 patients with PAD, including 72.2% without classic symptoms of intermittent claudication, performed in Chicago, Illinois between July 22, 2008, and December 14, 2012.
Participants were randomized to 1 of 2 parallel groups: a home-based group-mediated cognitive behavioral walking intervention or an attention control condition.
The primary outcome was 6-month change in 6-minute walk performance. Secondary outcomes included 6-month change in treadmill walking, physical activity, the Walking Impairment Questionnaire (WIQ), and Physical and Mental Health Composite Scores from the 12-item Short-Form Health Survey.
Participants randomized to the intervention group significantly increased their 6-minute walk distance ([reported in meters] 357.4 to 399.8 vs 353.3 to 342.2 for those in the control group; mean difference, 53.5 [95% CI, 33.2 to 73.8]; P < .001), maximal treadmill walking time (intervention, 7.91 to 9.44 minutes vs control, 7.56 to 8.09; mean difference, 1.01 minutes [95% CI, 0.07 to 1.95]; P = .04), accelerometer-measured physical activity over 7 days (intervention, 778.0 to 866.1 vs control, 671.6 to 645.0; mean difference, 114.7 activity units [95% CI, 12.82 to 216.5]; P = .03), WIQ distance score (intervention, 35.3 to 47.4 vs control, 33.3 to 34.4; mean difference, 11.1 [95% CI, 3.9 to 18.1]; P = .003), and WIQ speed score (intervention, 36.1 to 47.7 vs control, 35.3-36.6; mean difference, 10.4 [95% CI, 3.4 to 17.4]; P = .004).
A home-based walking exercise program significantly improved walking endurance, physical activity, and patient-perceived walking endurance and speed in PAD participants with and without classic claudication symptoms. These findings have implications for the large number of patients with PAD who are unable or unwilling to participate in supervised exercise programs.
clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00693940.
临床实践指南指出,没有足够的证据支持建议患有外周动脉疾病(PAD)的患者参加基于家庭的步行运动计划。
确定一种基于家庭的步行运动计划,该计划使用群体介导的认知行为干预,结合群体支持和自我调节技能,是否可以改善功能表现,与 PAD 患者(包括无间歇性跛行的 72.2%)的健康教育对照组相比。
设计、地点和患者:2008 年 7 月 22 日至 2012 年 12 月 14 日在伊利诺伊州芝加哥进行的一项随机对照临床试验,共有 194 名 PAD 患者参与,其中 72.2%无典型间歇性跛行症状。
参与者被随机分配到 2 个平行组中的 1 个:基于家庭的群体介导认知行为步行干预或注意力对照组。
主要结果是 6 个月时 6 分钟步行表现的变化。次要结果包括 6 个月时跑步机步行、身体活动、步行障碍问卷(WIQ)和 12 项简短健康调查的身体和心理健康综合评分的变化。
随机分配到干预组的参与者显著增加了他们的 6 分钟步行距离(以米为单位报告)[357.4 至 399.8 与对照组的 353.3 至 342.2 相比;平均差异为 53.5 [95%置信区间,33.2 至 73.8];P < 0.001)]、最大跑步机步行时间(干预组为 7.91 至 9.44 分钟与对照组的 7.56 至 8.09 分钟;平均差异为 1.01 分钟[95%置信区间,0.07 至 1.95];P = 0.04)]、7 天内通过加速度计测量的身体活动(干预组为 778.0 至 866.1 与对照组的 671.6 至 645.0 相比;平均差异为 114.7 个活动单位[95%置信区间,12.82 至 216.5];P = 0.03)]、WIQ 距离评分(干预组为 35.3 至 47.4 与对照组的 33.3 至 34.4 相比;平均差异为 11.1 [95%置信区间,3.9 至 18.1];P = 0.003)]和 WIQ 速度评分(干预组为 36.1 至 47.7 与对照组的 35.3-36.6 相比;平均差异为 10.4 [95%置信区间,3.4 至 17.4];P = 0.004)。
基于家庭的步行运动计划显著改善了 PAD 参与者(包括无典型跛行症状的参与者)的步行耐力、身体活动以及患者感知的步行耐力和速度。这些发现对外周动脉疾病患者数量众多且无法或不愿参加监督运动计划的患者具有重要意义。
clinicaltrials.gov 标识符:NCT00693940。