Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Cancer. 2013 Sep 15;119(18):3334-42. doi: 10.1002/cncr.28209. Epub 2013 Jul 2.
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the factors associated with response rate, resectability, and survival after cisplatin/interferon α-2b/doxorubicin/5-fluorouracil (PIAF) combination therapy in patients with initially unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma.
The study included 2 groups of patients treated with conventional high-dose PIAF (n = 84) between 1994 and 2003 and those without hepatitis or cirrhosis treated with modified PIAF (n = 33) between 2003 and 2012. Tolerance of chemotherapy, best radiographic response, rate of conversion to curative surgery, and overall survival were analyzed and compared between the 2 groups, and multivariate and logistic regression analyses were applied to identify predictors of response and survival.
The modified PIAF group had a higher median number of PIAF cycles (4 versus 2, P = .049), higher objective response rate (36% versus 15%, P = .013), higher rate of conversion to curative surgery (33% versus 10%, P = .004), and longer median overall survival (21.3 versus 10.6 months, P = .002). Multivariate analyses confirmed that positive hepatitis B serology (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.68; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.08-2.59) and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status ≥ 2 (HR = 1.75; 95% CI = 1.04-2.93) were associated with worse survival whereas curative surgical resection after PIAF treatment (HR = 0.15; 95% CI = 0.07-0.35) was associated with improved survival.
In patients with initially unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma, the modified PIAF regimen in patients with no hepatitis or cirrhosis is associated with improved response, resectability, and survival.
本研究旨在评估顺铂/干扰素 α-2b/多柔比星/5-氟尿嘧啶(PIAF)联合治疗初治不可切除肝细胞癌患者的缓解率、可切除性和生存率的相关因素。
该研究纳入两组患者,一组接受常规高剂量 PIAF(n = 84)治疗,时间为 1994 年至 2003 年;另一组为无肝炎或肝硬化的患者,接受改良 PIAF(n = 33)治疗,时间为 2003 年至 2012 年。比较两组患者的化疗耐受性、最佳影像学反应、转化为根治性手术的比率以及总生存率,并进行多变量和逻辑回归分析,以确定反应和生存的预测因素。
改良 PIAF 组的 PIAF 周期中位数更高(4 个周期比 2 个周期,P =.049),客观缓解率更高(36%比 15%,P =.013),转化为根治性手术的比率更高(33%比 10%,P =.004),中位总生存率更长(21.3 个月比 10.6 个月,P =.002)。多变量分析证实,乙型肝炎表面抗原阳性(危险比[HR] = 1.68;95%置信区间[CI] = 1.08-2.59)和东部肿瘤协作组表现状态≥2(HR = 1.75;95% CI = 1.04-2.93)与生存较差相关,而 PIAF 治疗后根治性手术切除(HR = 0.15;95% CI = 0.07-0.35)与生存改善相关。
在初治不可切除的肝细胞癌患者中,无肝炎或肝硬化的改良 PIAF 方案与改善反应、可切除性和生存率相关。