Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee 37212-1750, USA.
J Surg Res. 2013 Sep;184(1):467-71. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2013.05.011. Epub 2013 May 25.
Helicopter transport (HT) is necessary in the management of civilian trauma; however, its significant expense underscores the need to minimize overuse and inefficiency. Our objective was to determine whether on-scene physiologic criteria predict appropriate triage in HT trauma patients.
We performed a retrospective review of patients flown from the injury scene to the emergency department of a level 1 trauma center by a university HT service from January 2006 to December 2010. Demographics, mechanism of injury, scene revised trauma score (RTS), travel distance, trauma alert level, payer status, emergency department and hospital disposition, and injury severity scores were queried from the electronic medical record and Trauma Registry of the American College of Surgeons with similar data on patients admitted because of trauma by ground transport for comparison. Proper triage criteria were defined through by the American College of Surgeons Committee on Trauma.
We identified 2522 HT patients. Of these, 1491 (59%) were properly triaged and 1031 (41%) were overtriaged. Univariate analysis revealed that the mean scene RTS was significantly higher for over- versus proper triage (7.68 ± 0.67 and 6.97 ± 1.57 respectively, P < 0.001). Neither the scene RTS nor travel distance predicted the triage criteria in a regression model (odds ratio 0.37, 95% confidence interval 0.16-0.85, and odds ratio 0.67, 95% confidence interval 0.60-0.74, respectively). Compared with ground transport, admitted HT patients had significantly more blunt trauma, lower scene RTSs, higher injury severity scores, more intensive care unit and ventilator days, a longer length of stay, and a greater travel distance and were more likely to be intubated (P < 0.001).
The physiological criteria did not predict the triage status in HT trauma patients. Although >40% of HT patients were overtriaged, they were more severely injured and required greater institutional resources than did the ground transport patients. Overtriage by a helicopter transport program might be appropriate.
直升机运输(HT)在民用创伤管理中是必要的;然而,其高昂的费用突显了需要尽量减少过度使用和效率低下的问题。我们的目的是确定现场生理标准是否可预测 HT 创伤患者的适当分诊。
我们对 2006 年 1 月至 2010 年 12 月期间,由一所大学的 HT 服务从创伤现场运往一级创伤中心的患者进行了回顾性研究。从电子病历和美国外科医师学院的创伤登记处查询了患者的人口统计学资料、损伤机制、现场修订创伤评分(RTS)、旅行距离、创伤警报级别、付款人状态、急诊室和医院处置以及损伤严重程度评分,并与因地面运输创伤而入院的患者进行了类似数据的比较。适当的分诊标准是通过美国外科医师学院创伤委员会定义的。
我们确定了 2522 名 HT 患者。其中,1491 名(59%)得到了适当的分诊,1031 名(41%)被过度分诊。单变量分析显示,过度分诊组的现场 RTS 平均值明显高于适当分诊组(分别为 7.68 ± 0.67 和 6.97 ± 1.57,P < 0.001)。在回归模型中,现场 RTS 或旅行距离均不能预测分诊标准(比值比 0.37,95%置信区间 0.16-0.85 和比值比 0.67,95%置信区间 0.60-0.74)。与地面运输相比,入院 HT 患者有明显更多的钝性创伤、较低的现场 RTS、更高的损伤严重程度评分、更多的重症监护病房和呼吸机天数、更长的住院时间以及更长的旅行距离,并且更有可能需要插管(P < 0.001)。
生理标准不能预测 HT 创伤患者的分诊状况。尽管超过 40%的 HT 患者被过度分诊,但他们比地面运输患者受伤更严重,需要更多的机构资源。直升机运输计划的过度分诊可能是合适的。