• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

中文版口面美学量表的研制。

Development of the Chinese version of the Oro-facial Esthetic Scale.

机构信息

Chongqing Key Laboratory for Oral Diseases and Biomedical Sciences, Chongqing, China.

出版信息

J Oral Rehabil. 2013 Sep;40(9):670-7. doi: 10.1111/joor.12077. Epub 2013 Jul 6.

DOI:10.1111/joor.12077
PMID:23829233
Abstract

The aim of this study was to investigate the psychometric properties of the Oro-facial Esthetic Scale among Chinese-speaking patients. The original Oro-facial Esthetic Scale was cross-culturally adapted in accordance with the international standards to develop a Chinese version (OES-C). Unlike the original Oro-facial Esthetic Scale, the version employed in this study used a 5-point Likert scale with items rated from unsatisfactory to most satisfactory. Psychometric evaluation included the reliability and validity of the OES-C. The reliability of the OES-C was determined through internal consistency and test-retest methods. The validity of OES-C was analysed by content validity, discriminative validity, construct validity and convergent validity. The corrected item-total correlation coefficients of the OES-C ranged from 0·859 to 0·910. The inter-item correlation coefficients between each two of the eight items of the OES-C ranged from 0·766 to 0·922. The values of ICC ranged from 0·79 (95% CI = 0·54-0·98) to 0·93 (95% CI = 0·87-0·99), indicating an excellent agreement. Construct validity was proved by the presence of one-factor structure that accounted for 83·507% of the variance and fitted well into the model. Convergent validity was confirmed by the association between OES-C scores and self-reported oral aesthetics and three questions from the Oral Health Impact Profile related to aesthetics (correlation coefficients ranged from -0·830 to -0·702, P < 0·001). OES-C scores discriminated aesthetically impaired patients from healthy controls. This study provides preliminary evidence concerning the reliability and validity of the OES-C. The results show that the OES-C may be a useful tool for assessment of oro-facial esthetics in China.

摘要

本研究旨在调查 Oro-facial Esthetic Scale 在华语患者中的心理测量特性。原始的 Oro-facial Esthetic Scale 经过跨文化适应,符合国际标准,开发出中文版本(OES-C)。与原始的 Oro-facial Esthetic Scale 不同,本研究中使用的版本采用 5 点 Likert 量表,项目评分从不满意到最满意。心理测量评估包括 OES-C 的信度和效度。OES-C 的可靠性通过内部一致性和重测法确定。OES-C 的有效性通过内容有效性、区分有效性、结构有效性和收敛有效性进行分析。OES-C 的校正项目总分相关系数范围为 0.859 至 0.910。OES-C 的八项条目之间的每个两项之间的项目间相关系数范围为 0.766 至 0.922。ICC 值范围为 0.79(95%CI=0.54-0.98)至 0.93(95%CI=0.87-0.99),表明具有极好的一致性。结构有效性通过存在占方差 83.507%的单因素结构得到证明,并且很好地拟合模型。通过 OES-C 得分与自我报告的口腔美学和与美学相关的 Oral Health Impact Profile 中的三个问题之间的相关性(相关系数范围为-0.830 至-0.702,P<0.001)证实了收敛有效性。OES-C 得分可区分美学受损患者和健康对照者。本研究提供了 OES-C 信度和效度的初步证据。结果表明,OES-C 可能是评估中国口腔美学的有用工具。

相似文献

1
Development of the Chinese version of the Oro-facial Esthetic Scale.中文版口面美学量表的研制。
J Oral Rehabil. 2013 Sep;40(9):670-7. doi: 10.1111/joor.12077. Epub 2013 Jul 6.
2
Psychometric properties of the Croatian version of the Orofacial Esthetic Scale and suggestions for modification.《Orofacial Esthetic Scale 克罗地亚语版的心理测量学特性及修订建议》
Int J Prosthodont. 2011 Nov-Dec;24(6):523-33.
3
Reliability and validity of the Orofacial Esthetic Scale in prosthodontic patients.修复患者的口腔美学量表的可靠性和有效性。
Int J Prosthodont. 2010 May-Jun;23(3):257-62.
4
Impact of administration mode on Oro-facial Appearance assessment using the Oro-facial Esthetic Scale.给药方式对使用口腔面部美学量表进行口腔面部外观评估的影响。
J Oral Rehabil. 2018 Dec;45(12):932-938. doi: 10.1111/joor.12715. Epub 2018 Sep 30.
5
Psychometric properties of the Albanian version of the Orofacial Esthetic Scale: OES-ALB.阿尔巴尼亚语版口面部美学量表(OES-ALB)的心理测量学特性
BMC Oral Health. 2015 Aug 26;15:97. doi: 10.1186/s12903-015-0083-x.
6
Psychometric properties of the Dutch version of the Orofacial Esthetic Scale (OES-NL) in dental patients with and without self-reported tooth wear.荷兰版口腔面部美学量表(OES-NL)在有和无自我报告牙齿磨损的牙科患者中的心理测量特性。
J Oral Rehabil. 2015 Nov;42(11):803-9. doi: 10.1111/joor.12314. Epub 2015 Jun 3.
7
Development and Validation of the French Version of the Orofacial Esthetic Scale.口腔颌面部美学量表的法语文本的制定与验证。
Int J Prosthodont. 2019 Mar/Apr;32(2):137-142. doi: 10.11607/ijp.6002.
8
Development, validation and psychometric properties of the Arabic version of the Orofacial Esthetic Scale: OES-Ar.口面部美学量表阿拉伯语版(OES-Ar)的开发、验证及心理测量学特性
J Prosthodont Res. 2017 Jul;61(3):290-296. doi: 10.1016/j.jpor.2016.10.004. Epub 2016 Nov 22.
9
Normative values for the Oro-facial Esthetic Scale in Sweden.瑞典口腔面部美学量表的标准值。
J Oral Rehabil. 2014 Feb;41(2):148-54. doi: 10.1111/joor.12121. Epub 2013 Dec 23.
10
Assessing the psychometric characteristics of the Macedonian version of the Oral Health Impact Profile questionnaire (OHIP-MAC49).评估口腔健康影响程度问卷马其顿语版(OHIP-MAC49)的心理测量学特征。
Oral Health Dent Manag. 2012 Mar;11(1):29-38.

引用本文的文献

1
Behavioral determinants of dental and facial esthetic self-perception among an academic population: a cross-sectional study.学术人群中牙齿和面部美学自我认知的行为决定因素:一项横断面研究。
BMC Psychol. 2025 Jun 10;13(1):625. doi: 10.1186/s40359-025-02802-0.
2
Assessing Orofacial Esthetics in Prosthodontic Care: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Psychometric Properties.口腔修复治疗中口腔颌面部美学评估:心理测量学特性的系统评价与荟萃分析
Pak J Med Sci. 2024 Sep;40(8):1867-1872. doi: 10.12669/pjms.40.8.9860.
3
Development and validation of the Italian version of the Orofacial Esthetic Scale (OES-I).
口面部美学量表意大利语版(OES-I)的编制与验证
Clin Oral Investig. 2023 Mar;27(3):1055-1062. doi: 10.1007/s00784-022-04671-y. Epub 2022 Sep 19.
4
Comparison of two rating scales with the orofacial esthetic scale and practical recommendations for its application.两种评分量表与口腔美学量表的比较及其实用建议。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2022 Sep 6;20(1):131. doi: 10.1186/s12955-022-02006-9.
5
Including the patient's oral health perspective in evidence-based decision-making.将患者的口腔健康观点纳入循证决策。
Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2021 Aug;64(8):959-966. doi: 10.1007/s00103-021-03375-0. Epub 2021 Jul 9.
6
Development of a one-item version of the Orofacial Esthetic Scale.开发一种简化版的口面美学量表。
Clin Oral Investig. 2022 Jan;26(1):713-718. doi: 10.1007/s00784-021-04049-6. Epub 2021 Jul 6.
7
Perception of orofacial appearance among laypersons with diverse social and demographic status.不同社会和人口统计学地位的外行对口面部外观的感知。
PLoS One. 2020 Sep 17;15(9):e0239232. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0239232. eCollection 2020.
8
Development and psychometric properties of the Portuguese version of the Orofacial Esthetic Scale: OES-Pt.葡萄牙语版口腔面部美学量表(OES-Pt)的开发及心理测量特性
PeerJ. 2020 Mar 17;8:e8814. doi: 10.7717/peerj.8814. eCollection 2020.
9
Development, validity and reliability of the Orofacial Esthetic Scale - Spanish version.《口面美学量表-西班牙语版的制定、有效性和可靠性》。
J Prosthodont Res. 2018 Oct;62(4):456-461. doi: 10.1016/j.jpor.2018.05.003. Epub 2018 Jun 1.
10
Psychometric properties of the Albanian version of the Orofacial Esthetic Scale: OES-ALB.阿尔巴尼亚语版口面部美学量表(OES-ALB)的心理测量学特性
BMC Oral Health. 2015 Aug 26;15:97. doi: 10.1186/s12903-015-0083-x.