Qutubuddin Abu, Reis Timothy, Alramadhani Raed, Cifu David X, Towne Alan, Carne William
Richmond Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Southeast Parkinson's Disease Research, Education and Clinical Center, 1220 Broad Rock Boulevard, Richmond, VA 23249, USA ; Department of PM&R, Virginia Commonwealth University, 1223 East Marshall Street, Richmond, VA 23298, USA ; Department of Neurology, Virginia Commonwealth University, P.O. Box 980599, Richmond, VA 23298-0599, USA.
Rehabil Res Pract. 2013;2013:375267. doi: 10.1155/2013/375267. Epub 2013 Jun 19.
Objective. The concept of forced exercise has drawn attention for the treatment of Parkinson's disease symptoms with anecdotal reports of success. This study sought to ascertain any significant effect of forced exercise using a motorized stationary bicycle when compared to controls on Parkinson's disease symptoms in a blinded, randomized, and controlled setting. Setting. Parkinson's disease outpatient clinic, Veterans Administration Medical Center. Method. We assessed 23 patients (13 experimental and 10 controls) on a number of standard Parkinson's measures at baseline, after participation in eight weeks of twice weekly forced exercise or eight weeks of conventional clinic care, and then after a three-month period had elapsed. Dependent measures were UPDRS-III, Berg Balance Scale, finger taping test, and the PDQ-39. Results. Results did not demonstrate any main effect differences between the exercise and control groups on any measure at any point in time. A within subjects effect was demonstrated for the forced exercise group on overall UPDRS-III scores at the three-month end point. No other within group effects were noted. Results suggest that early enthusiasm for forced exercise may need tempering. Limitations of the study are discussed as well as numerous logistical challenges to this type of study.
目的。强制运动的概念因成功的轶事报道而受到关注,用于治疗帕金森病症状。本研究旨在通过在盲法、随机和对照环境中,将使用电动固定自行车的强制运动与对照组相比,确定其对帕金森病症状的任何显著影响。
地点。退伍军人管理局医疗中心帕金森病门诊。
方法。我们在基线时、在参与为期八周的每周两次强制运动或八周的传统门诊护理后,以及在三个月过去后,对23名患者(13名实验组和10名对照组)进行了多项标准帕金森病测量。相关测量指标包括统一帕金森病评定量表第三部分(UPDRS-III)、伯格平衡量表、手指敲击试验和帕金森病问卷-39(PDQ-39)。
结果。结果表明,在任何时间点的任何测量指标上,运动组和对照组之间均未显示出任何主要效应差异。在三个月的终点时,强制运动组在总体UPDRS-III评分上显示出受试者内效应。未观察到其他组内效应。结果表明,对强制运动的早期热情可能需要降温。同时讨论了该研究的局限性以及此类研究面临的众多后勤挑战。