Tufts University School of Medicine, Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Steward St. Elizabeth's Medical Center, Boston, MA 02135, USA.
J Control Release. 2013 Oct 28;171(2):201-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2013.06.038. Epub 2013 Jul 18.
Local drug delivery preferentially loads target tissues with a concentration gradient from the surface or point of release that tapers down to more distant sites. Drug that diffuses down this gradient must be in unbound form, but such drug can only elicit a biologic effect through receptor interactions. Drug excess loads tissues, increasing gradients and driving penetration, but with limited added biological response. We examined the hypothesis that local application reduces dramatically systemic circulating drug levels but leads to significantly higher tissue drug concentration than might be needed with systemic infusion in a rat model of local epicardial inotropic therapy. Epinephrine was infused systemically or released locally to the anterior wall of the heart using a novel polymeric platform that provides steady, sustained release over a range of precise doses. Epinephrine tissue concentration, upregulation of cAMP, and global left ventricular response were measured at equivalent doses and at doses equally effective in raising indices of contractility. The contractile stimulation by epinephrine was linked to drug tissue levels and commensurate cAMP upregulation for IV systemic infusion, but not with local epicardial delivery. Though cAMP was a powerful predictor of contractility with local application, tissue epinephrine levels were high and variable--only a small fraction of the deposited epinephrine was utilized in second messenger signaling and biologic effect. The remainder of deposited drug was likely used in diffusive transport and distribution. Systemic side effects were far more profound with IV infusion which, though it increased contractility, also induced tachycardia and loss of systemic vascular resistance, which were not seen with local application. Local epicardial inotropic delivery illustrates then a paradigm of how target tissues differentially handle and utilize drug compared to systemic infusion.
局部给药通过从释放表面或释放点开始逐渐变细的浓度梯度优先将目标组织加载药物,药物沿着这个梯度扩散必须处于未结合状态,但这种药物只能通过受体相互作用产生生物学效应。药物过量会增加组织的药物浓度梯度并促进渗透,但生物反应增加有限。我们检验了这样一个假设,即局部应用会显著降低系统循环药物水平,但在局部心外膜变力治疗的大鼠模型中,与全身输注相比,会导致组织药物浓度显著升高。使用一种新型聚合物平台,将肾上腺素全身输注或局部释放到心脏前壁,该平台可在一系列精确剂量范围内提供稳定、持续的释放。在等效剂量和同等有效提高收缩性指数的剂量下,测量肾上腺素的组织浓度、cAMP 的上调和整个左心室的反应。肾上腺素的收缩刺激与 IV 全身输注的药物组织水平和相应的 cAMP 上调有关,但与局部心外膜给药无关。尽管 cAMP 是局部应用时收缩性的有力预测因子,但组织内肾上腺素水平很高且变化很大——只有一小部分沉积的肾上腺素被用于第二信使信号和生物学效应。其余的沉积药物可能用于扩散运输和分布。IV 输注的全身副作用要严重得多,尽管它增加了收缩性,但也引起了心动过速和全身血管阻力的丧失,而局部应用则没有。局部心外膜变力治疗因此说明了一个范例,即靶组织如何与全身输注相比,以不同的方式处理和利用药物。