Suppr超能文献

ICU 获得性肺炎伴或不伴病因诊断:结局比较。

ICU-acquired pneumonia with or without etiologic diagnosis: a comparison of outcomes.

机构信息

Servei de Pneumologia, Institut del Torax, Hospital Clinic, IDIBAPS, Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.

出版信息

Crit Care Med. 2013 Sep;41(9):2133-43. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e31828a453b.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The impact of ICU-acquired pneumonia without etiologic diagnosis on patients' outcomes is largely unknown. We compared the clinical characteristics, inflammatory response, and outcomes between patients with and without microbiologically confirmed ICU-acquired pneumonia.

DESIGN

Prospective observational study.

SETTING

ICUs of a university teaching hospital.

PATIENTS

We prospectively collected 270 consecutive patients with ICU-acquired pneumonia. Patients were clustered according to positive or negative microbiologic results.

INTERVENTIONS

None.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

We compared the characteristics and outcomes between both groups. Negative microbiology was found in 82 patients (30%). Both groups had similar baseline severity scores. Patients with negative microbiology presented more frequently chronic renal failure (15 [18%] vs 11 [6%]; p=0.003), chronic heart disorders (35 [43%] vs 55 [29%]; p=0.044), less frequently previous intubation (44 [54%] vs 135 [72%]; p=0.006), more severe hypoxemia (PaO2/FIO2: 165±73 mm Hg vs 199±79 mm Hg; p=0.001), and shorter ICU stay before the onset of pneumonia (5±5 days vs 7±9 days; p=0.001) compared with patients with positive microbiology. The systemic inflammatory response was similar between both groups. Negative microbiology resulted in less changes of empiric treatment (33 [40%] vs 112 [60%]; p=0.005) and shorter total duration of antimicrobials (13±6 days vs 17±12 days; p=0.006) than positive microbiology. Following adjustment for potential confounders, patients with positive microbiology had higher hospital mortality (adjusted odds ratio 2.96, 95% confidence interval 1.24-7.04, p=0.014) and lower 90-day survival (adjusted hazard ratio 0.50, 95% confidence interval 0.27-0.94, p=0.031), with a nonsignificant lower 28-day survival.

CONCLUSIONS

Although the possible influence of previous intubation in mortality of both groups is not completely discarded, negative microbiologic findings in clinically suspected ICU-acquired pneumonia are associated with less frequent previous intubation, shorter duration of antimicrobial treatment, and better survival. Future studies should corroborate the presence of pneumonia in patients with suspected ICU-acquired pneumonia and negative microbiology.

摘要

目的

目前尚不清楚重症加强治疗病房(ICU)获得性肺炎而未明确病因对患者预后的影响。本研究比较了微生物学确诊的 ICU 获得性肺炎患者与未确诊的 ICU 获得性肺炎患者的临床特征、炎症反应和结局。

设计

前瞻性观察性研究。

地点

一所大学教学医院的 ICU。

患者

前瞻性连续收集了 270 例 ICU 获得性肺炎患者。根据微生物学阳性或阴性结果将患者进行分组。

干预措施

无。

测量和主要结果

比较了两组的特征和结局。82 例(30%)患者的微生物学结果为阴性。两组患者的基线严重程度评分相似。微生物学阴性组患者更常患有慢性肾衰竭(15 例[18%]比 11 例[6%];p=0.003)、慢性心脏疾病(35 例[43%]比 55 例[29%];p=0.044),较少接受过先前的插管(44 例[54%]比 135 例[72%];p=0.006),更严重的低氧血症(PaO2/FIO2:165±73mmHg 比 199±79mmHg;p=0.001),且在发生肺炎之前 ICU 住院时间更短(5±5 天比 7±9 天;p=0.001)。两组患者的全身炎症反应相似。与微生物学阳性组相比,微生物学阴性组的经验性治疗变化更小(33 例[40%]比 112 例[60%];p=0.005),抗菌药物总疗程更短(13±6 天比 17±12 天;p=0.006)。在校正了潜在混杂因素后,微生物学阳性组的住院死亡率更高(调整后优势比 2.96,95%置信区间 1.24-7.04,p=0.014),90 天生存率更低(调整后危险比 0.50,95%置信区间 0.27-0.94,p=0.031),28 天生存率虽较低,但无统计学意义。

结论

尽管两组中先前插管的可能影响尚不完全排除,但在疑似 ICU 获得性肺炎的患者中发现微生物学阴性结果与较少的先前插管、较短的抗菌药物治疗时间和更好的生存有关。未来的研究应证实疑似 ICU 获得性肺炎且微生物学阴性的患者存在肺炎。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验