Simões Rodrigo Polaquini, Castello-Simões Viviane, Mendes Renata Gonçalves, Archiza Bruno, Dos Santos Daniel Augusto, Bonjorno José Carlos, de Oliveira Claudio Ricardo, Catai Aparecida Maria, Arena Ross, Borghi-Silva Audrey
Cardiopulmonary Physiotherapy Laboratory, Nucleus of Research in Physical Exercise of Federal University of Sao Carlos, Sao Carlos, SP, Brazil.
Clin Physiol Funct Imaging. 2014 Mar;34(2):98-108. doi: 10.1111/cpf.12070. Epub 2013 Jul 23.
The purposes of this study were to determine anaerobic threshold (AT) during discontinuous dynamic and resistive exercise protocols by analysing of heart rate variability (HRV) and blood lactate (BL) in healthy elderly subjects and compare the cardiovascular, metabolic and autonomic variables obtained from these two forms of exercise. Fourteen elderly (70 ± 4 years) apparently healthy males underwent the following tests: (i) incremental ramp test on cycle ergometer, (ii) one repetition maximum (1RM) leg press at 45°, (iii) a discontinuous exercise test on a cycle ergometer (DET-C) protocol and (iv) a resistance exercise leg press (DET-L) protocol. Heart rate, blood pressure and BL were obtained during each increment of exercise intensity. No significant differences (P>0·05) were found between methods of AT determination (BL and HRV) nor the relative intensity corresponding to AT (30% of maximum intensity) between the types of exercise (DET-C and DET-L). Furthermore, no significant differences (P>0·05) were found between the DET-C and DET-L in relation to HRV, however, the DET-L provided higher values of systolic blood pressure and BL (P<0·05) from the intensity corresponding to AT. We conclude that HRV was effective in determination of AT, and the parasympathetic modulation responses obtained during dynamic and resistive exercise protocols were similar when compared at the same relative intensity. However, DET-L resulted in higher values of blood pressure and BL at workloads beyond AT.
本研究的目的是通过分析健康老年受试者的心率变异性(HRV)和血乳酸(BL),确定在不连续动态和阻力运动方案期间的无氧阈值(AT),并比较从这两种运动形式获得的心血管、代谢和自主神经变量。14名(70±4岁)明显健康的老年男性接受了以下测试:(i)在自行车测力计上进行递增斜坡测试,(ii)在45°进行一次重复最大值(1RM)腿举,(iii)在自行车测力计上进行不连续运动测试(DET-C)方案,以及(iv)阻力运动腿举(DET-L)方案。在每次运动强度增加期间获取心率、血压和BL。在AT测定方法(BL和HRV)之间以及运动类型(DET-C和DET-L)之间对应于AT的相对强度(最大强度的30%)之间未发现显著差异(P>0·05)。此外,在HRV方面,DET-C和DET-L之间未发现显著差异(P>0·05),然而,从对应于AT的强度开始,DET-L提供了更高的收缩压和BL值(P<0·05)。我们得出结论,HRV在AT的测定中是有效的,并且在相同相对强度下比较时,动态和阻力运动方案期间获得的副交感神经调节反应相似。然而,在超过AT的工作量下,DET-L导致血压和BL值更高。