Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands; Department of Medical Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Cancer Treat Rev. 2014 Feb;40(1):86-92. doi: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2013.06.001. Epub 2013 Jul 23.
In recent years, studies investigating neoadjuvant therapies have been emerging, because of the additional benefits it provides in terms of facilitating less extensive surgery and the possibility of investigating tumor biological features and response. Neoadjuvant hormonal therapy (NHT) is, in general, considered to be a suitable option for hormone receptor (HR)-positive patients who are unfit for chemotherapy or surgery, and is increasingly being utilized to achieve tumor downsizing before surgery in postmenopausal women. Studies investigating NHT were reviewed for tumor response data. NHT demonstrated similar efficacy to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NCT) in HR-positive breast cancer patients. Clinical responses ranged from 13.5% to 100%, with treatment periods between 3 and 24 months. In studies comparing tamoxifen with aromatase inhibitors, the latter were superior in terms of tumor response and rates of breast-conserving surgery (BCS). In most studies with treatment durations longer than 3 months, tumor response rates increased. Therefore, longer durations of NHT are feasible and should be considered as an alternative to NCT in selected patients.
近年来,由于新辅助治疗在促进手术范围缩小和探索肿瘤生物学特征和反应方面的额外益处,相关研究不断涌现。新辅助激素治疗(NHT)通常被认为是不适合化疗或手术的激素受体(HR)阳性患者的合适选择,并且越来越多地用于在绝经后妇女手术前实现肿瘤缩小。对 NHT 的研究进行了肿瘤反应数据的综述。NHT 在 HR 阳性乳腺癌患者中的疗效与新辅助化疗(NCT)相似。临床反应率为 13.5%至 100%,治疗期为 3 至 24 个月。在比较他莫昔芬和芳香酶抑制剂的研究中,后者在肿瘤反应和保乳手术(BCS)率方面更具优势。在大多数治疗期超过 3 个月的研究中,肿瘤反应率增加。因此,更长时间的 NHT 是可行的,并且应考虑作为某些患者的 NCT 替代方案。