Suppr超能文献

院内心脏骤停:我们能改变什么吗?

In-hospital cardiac arrest: can we change something?

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology, Resuscitation and ICU, the Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital Osijek, Josip Juraj Strossmayer University of Osijek, Josipa Huttlera 4, 31000, Osijek, Croatia,

出版信息

Wien Klin Wochenschr. 2013 Sep;125(17-18):516-23. doi: 10.1007/s00508-013-0409-0. Epub 2013 Aug 9.

Abstract

Cardiac arrest is classified as 'in-hospital' if it occurs in a hospitalised patient who had a pulse at the time of admission. A probability of patient's survival until hospital discharge is very low. The reasons for this are old age, multiple co-morbidity of patients, late recognition of cardiac arrest, poor knowledge about basic life support algorithm, insufficient equipment, absence of qualified resuscitation teams (RTs) and poor organization.The aim of this study was to demonstrate characteristics of in-hospital cardiac arrests and resuscitation measures in University Hospital Osijek. We analysed retrospectively all resuscitation procedures data where anaesthesiology RTs provided cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) during 5-year period.We analysed 309 in-hospital resuscitation attempts with complete documentation. Victims of cardiac arrest were principally elderly patients, neurological (30.4 %), surgical (25.24 %) and neurosurgical patients (15.2 %) with many associated severe diseases. In 85.6 % of the cases, resuscitation was initiated by ward personnel and RTs arrived within 5 min in 67 % of the cases. However, in 14.6 % of the cases resuscitation measures had not been started before RT arrival. We found statistical correlation between lower initial survival rates and length of hospital stay (p = 0.001), presence of cerebral ischemia (p = 0.026) or cardiomyopathy (p = 0.004) and duration of CPR (p = 0.041). Initial survival was very low (14.6 %), and full recovery was accomplished in only eight patients out of 309 (2.59 %).Identification of terminal chronic patients in which the CPR is not reasonable, a better organisation and ward personnel education can contribute to better overall success.

摘要

心脏骤停如果发生在入院时已有脉搏的住院患者中,则被归类为“院内”。患者存活至出院的概率非常低。造成这种情况的原因是患者年龄较大、合并多种疾病、心脏骤停识别较晚、对基本生命支持算法的了解不足、设备不足、没有合格的复苏团队(RTs)以及组织不善。本研究旨在展示奥西耶克大学医院院内心脏骤停的特征和复苏措施。我们回顾性分析了麻醉科 RTs 在 5 年期间进行心肺复苏(CPR)的所有复苏程序数据。我们分析了 309 例有完整记录的院内复苏尝试。心脏骤停的受害者主要是老年患者、神经科(30.4%)、外科(25.24%)和神经外科患者(15.2%),伴有许多严重的合并症。在 85.6%的情况下,复苏是由病房人员发起的,RTs 在 67%的情况下在 5 分钟内到达。然而,在 14.6%的情况下,RT 到达之前没有开始复苏措施。我们发现初始生存率与住院时间(p=0.001)、存在脑缺血(p=0.026)或心肌病(p=0.004)以及 CPR 持续时间(p=0.041)之间存在统计学相关性。初始生存率非常低(14.6%),309 例患者中只有 8 例(2.59%)完全康复。识别不适合进行 CPR 的终末期慢性患者、更好的组织和病房人员教育可以提高整体成功率。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验