Suppr超能文献

在 3 分钟全力测试中确定的关键功率、呼吸补偿点、气体交换阈值和通气阈值之间的关系。

The relationships among critical power determined from a 3-min all-out test, respiratory compensation point, gas exchange threshold, and ventilatory threshold.

机构信息

Department of Nutrition and Health Sciences, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, 110 Ruth Leverton Hall, Lincoln, NE 68583-0806, USA.

出版信息

Res Q Exerc Sport. 2013 Jun;84(2):232-8. doi: 10.1080/02701367.2013.784723.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Critical power (CP) from the 3-min test was compared to the power outputs associated with thresholds determined from gas exchange parameters that have been used to demarcate the exercise-intensity domains including the respiratory compensation point (RCP), gas exchange threshold (GET), and ventilatory threshold (VT).

METHOD

Twenty-eight participants performed an incremental-cycle ergometer test to exhaustion. The VT was determined from the relationship between the ventilatory equivalent for oxygen uptake (VE/VO2) versus VO2 and the GET was determined using the V-slope method (VCO2 vs. VO2). The RCP was identified from the VE-versus-VCO2 relationship. CP was the average power output during the last 30 s of the 3-min all-out test. Linear regression was used to determine the power outputs associated with the RCP, GET, and VT, as well as the VO2 associated with CP. Mean differences among the associated power outputs, percent VO2 peak, and percent peak power output for the GET, VT, RCP, and CP were analyzed using separate one-way repeated-measures analyses of variance.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences between CP (187 +/- 47W) and the power output associated with RCP (190 +/- 49W) or between the power outputs associated with GET (139 +/- 37W) and VT (145 +/- 37W). The power outputs associated with GET and VT, however, were significantly less than were those at CP and associated with RCRP.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings suggest CP and RCP demarcate the heavy from severe exercise-intensity domain and result from a different mechanism of fatigue than that of GET and VT, possibly hyperkalemia.

摘要

目的

将 3 分钟测试的临界功率 (CP) 与通过气体交换参数确定的与阈值相关的功率输出进行比较,这些参数已被用于划分运动强度域,包括呼吸补偿点 (RCP)、气体交换阈值 (GET) 和通气阈值 (VT)。

方法

28 名参与者进行了递增式测功仪直至力竭测试。VT 通过摄氧量与通气当量 (VE/VO2) 与 VO2 之间的关系确定,而 GET 则使用 V 斜率法 (VCO2 与 VO2) 确定。RCP 是从 VE 与 VCO2 的关系中确定的。CP 是 3 分钟全力测试最后 30 秒的平均功率输出。线性回归用于确定与 RCP、GET 和 VT 相关的功率输出,以及与 CP 相关的 VO2。使用单独的单向重复测量方差分析分析与 GET、VT、RCP 和 CP 相关的相关功率输出、峰值 VO2 的百分比和峰值功率输出的百分比之间的均值差异。

结果

CP(187 +/- 47W)与 RCP(190 +/- 49W)相关的功率输出或与 GET(139 +/- 37W)和 VT(145 +/- 37W)相关的功率输出之间没有显著差异。然而,与 GET 和 VT 相关的功率输出明显低于 CP 和与 RCRP 相关的功率输出。

结论

这些发现表明 CP 和 RCP 划分了剧烈和严重运动强度域,其疲劳机制与 GET 和 VT 不同,可能是高钾血症。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验