Suppr超能文献

432 个美国手语符号的主观频率评级。

Subjective frequency ratings for 432 ASL signs.

机构信息

Department of Linguistics, University of California San Diego, 9500 Gilman Drive, La Jolla, CA, 92093-0108, USA,

出版信息

Behav Res Methods. 2014 Jun;46(2):526-39. doi: 10.3758/s13428-013-0370-x.

Abstract

Given the importance of lexical frequency for psycholinguistic research and the lack of comprehensive frequency data for sign languages, we collected subjective estimates of lexical frequency for 432 signs in American Sign Language (ASL). Our participants were 59 deaf signers who first began to acquire ASL at ages ranging from birth to 14 years old and who had a minimum of 10 years of experience. Subjective frequency estimates were made on a scale ranging from 1 = rarely see the sign to 7 = always see the sign. The mean subjective frequency ratings for individual signs did not vary in relation to age of sign language exposure (AoLE), chronological age, or length of ASL experience. Nor did AoLE show significant effects on the response times (RTs) for making the ratings. However, RTs were highly correlated with mean frequency ratings. These results suggest that the distributions of subjective lexical frequencies are consistent across signers with varying AoLEs. The implications for research practice are that subjective frequency ratings from random samples of highly experienced deaf signers can provide a reasonable measure of lexical control in sign language experiments. The Appendix gives the mean and median subjective frequency ratings and the mean and median log(RT) of the ASL signs for the entire sample; the supplemental material gives these measures for the three AoLE groups: native, early, and late.

摘要

鉴于词汇频率对于心理语言学研究的重要性,以及手语缺乏全面的频率数据,我们收集了美国手语(ASL)中 432 个手语的主观词汇频率估计值。我们的参与者是 59 名聋人手语使用者,他们的年龄从出生到 14 岁不等,最早开始学习 ASL,并且有至少 10 年的经验。主观频率估计值的范围从 1(很少看到这个手势)到 7(总是看到这个手势)。单个手语的平均主观频率评分与手语接触年龄(AoLE)、实际年龄或 ASL 经验长短无关。AoLE 也没有对手语评分的反应时间(RT)产生显著影响。然而,RT 与平均频率评分高度相关。这些结果表明,主观词汇频率分布在手语使用者中是一致的,他们的 AoLE 不同。这对研究实践的意义在于,来自具有不同 AoLE 的高度经验丰富的聋人手语使用者的随机样本的主观频率评分可以为手语实验中的词汇控制提供合理的衡量标准。附录给出了整个样本的 ASL 手势的平均和中位数主观频率评分以及平均和中位数 log(RT);补充材料给出了这三个 AoLE 组(母语、早期和晚期)的这些度量值。

相似文献

1
Subjective frequency ratings for 432 ASL signs.
Behav Res Methods. 2014 Jun;46(2):526-39. doi: 10.3758/s13428-013-0370-x.
2
The ASL-LEX 2.0 Project: A Database of Lexical and Phonological Properties for 2,723 Signs in American Sign Language.
J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ. 2021 Mar 17;26(2):263-277. doi: 10.1093/deafed/enaa038.
3
ASL-LEX: A lexical database of American Sign Language.
Behav Res Methods. 2017 Apr;49(2):784-801. doi: 10.3758/s13428-016-0742-0.
4
Sensorimotor system engagement during ASL sign perception: An EEG study in deaf signers and hearing non-signers.
Cortex. 2019 Oct;119:457-469. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2019.07.016. Epub 2019 Aug 9.
6
The sign superiority effect: Lexical status facilitates peripheral handshape identification for deaf signers.
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2020 Nov;46(11):1397-1410. doi: 10.1037/xhp0000862. Epub 2020 Sep 17.
8
The effects of multiple linguistic variables on picture naming in American Sign Language.
Behav Res Methods. 2022 Oct;54(5):2502-2521. doi: 10.3758/s13428-021-01751-x. Epub 2021 Dec 16.
9
Real-time processing of ASL signs: Delayed first language acquisition affects organization of the mental lexicon.
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2015 Jul;41(4):1130-9. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000088. Epub 2014 Dec 22.
10
The link between form and meaning in American Sign Language: lexical processing effects.
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2009 Mar;35(2):550-7. doi: 10.1037/a0014547.

引用本文的文献

2
Production of real signs but not pseudosigns affected by age of acquisition in American Sign Language.
Mem Cognit. 2025 Jul;53(5):1356-1379. doi: 10.3758/s13421-024-01656-y. Epub 2025 Jan 22.
3
A Usage-Based Proposal for Argument Structure of Directional Verbs in American Sign Language.
Front Psychol. 2022 May 17;13:808493. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.808493. eCollection 2022.
4
The Cortical Organization of Syntactic Processing Is Supramodal: Evidence from American Sign Language.
J Cogn Neurosci. 2022 Jan 5;34(2):224-235. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_01790.
5
The Croatian psycholinguistic database: Estimates for 6000 nouns, verbs, adjectives and adverbs.
Behav Res Methods. 2021 Aug;53(4):1799-1816. doi: 10.3758/s13428-020-01533-x. Epub 2021 Apr 26.
6
Implicit causality biases and thematic roles in American Sign Language.
Behav Res Methods. 2021 Oct;53(5):2172-2190. doi: 10.3758/s13428-021-01561-1. Epub 2021 Mar 29.
7
The ASL-LEX 2.0 Project: A Database of Lexical and Phonological Properties for 2,723 Signs in American Sign Language.
J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ. 2021 Mar 17;26(2):263-277. doi: 10.1093/deafed/enaa038.
8
Psycholinguistic norms for more than 300 lexical signs in German Sign Language (DGS).
Behav Res Methods. 2021 Oct;53(5):1817-1832. doi: 10.3758/s13428-020-01524-y. Epub 2021 Feb 11.
9
Operationalization of Sign Language Phonological Similarity and its Effects on Lexical Access.
J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ. 2017 Jul 1;22(3):303-315. doi: 10.1093/deafed/enx014.
10
ASL-LEX: A lexical database of American Sign Language.
Behav Res Methods. 2017 Apr;49(2):784-801. doi: 10.3758/s13428-016-0742-0.

本文引用的文献

1
The initial stages of first-language acquisition begun in adolescence: when late looks early.
J Child Lang. 2013 Mar;40(2):391-414. doi: 10.1017/S0305000911000535. Epub 2012 Jan 20.
2
Lexical frequency in sign languages.
J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ. 2012 Spring;17(2):163-93. doi: 10.1093/deafed/enr036. Epub 2011 Aug 12.
3
Age of acquisition effects on the functional organization of language in the adult brain.
Brain Lang. 2011 Oct;119(1):16-29. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2011.05.007. Epub 2011 Jun 25.
4
Sign Perception and Recognition in Non-Native Signers of ASL.
Lang Learn Dev. 2011 Jan 1;7(2):149-168. doi: 10.1080/15475441.2011.543393.
5
Effects of sign language experience on categorical perception of dynamic ASL pseudosigns.
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2010 Apr;72(3):747-62. doi: 10.3758/APP.72.3.747.
7
Bayesian t tests for accepting and rejecting the null hypothesis.
Psychon Bull Rev. 2009 Apr;16(2):225-37. doi: 10.3758/PBR.16.2.225.
9
The British Sign Language (BSL) norms for age of acquisition, familiarity, and iconicity.
Behav Res Methods. 2008 Nov;40(4):1079-87. doi: 10.3758/BRM.40.4.1079.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验