Suppr超能文献

2011-2012 年度甲型 H3N2 和乙型流感病毒感染患儿中扎那米韦与奥司他韦治疗的临床效果比较。

Comparison of the clinical effectiveness of zanamivir and laninamivir octanoate for children with influenza A(H3N2) and B in the 2011-2012 season.

机构信息

Department of Pediatrics, Hokkaido University Graduate School of Medicine, Sapporo, Japan.

出版信息

Influenza Other Respir Viruses. 2014 Mar;8(2):151-8. doi: 10.1111/irv.12147. Epub 2013 Aug 19.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the clinical effectiveness of the two inhaled neuraminidase inhibitors (NAIs), zanamivir (ZN) and laninamivir octate (LO), for influenza A(H3N2) and B virus infections.

DESIGN

A prospective, multicenter observational study was conducted from January to April in 2012.

SETTING

Outpatients aged 5-18 years who had a temperature of 37.5°C or higher and were diagnosed as having influenza based on an immunochromatographic assay were enrolled.

SAMPLE

A total of 338 patients treated with ZN and 314 patients treated with LO were compared.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The duration of fever after administration of the first dose of each NAI was evaluated as a primary endpoint. The secondary endpoint was episodes of biphasic fever.

RESULTS

No statistically significant difference in the duration of fever was found between the ZN and LO groups (log-rank test, P = 0.117). A logistic regression model showed that episodes of biphasic fever increased by 1.19 times for every decrease of 1 year of age (P = 0.016) and that the number of biphasic fever episodes in patients treated with LO was 5.80-times greater than that in patients treated with ZN (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Although the duration of fever in the LO group was comparable to that in the ZN group, episodes of biphasic fever were more frequent in younger children and in the LO group than in the ZN group.

摘要

目的

评估两种吸入型神经氨酸酶抑制剂(NAI),扎那米韦(ZN)和拉尼米韦辛(LO),对甲型 H3N2 和乙型流感病毒感染的临床疗效。

设计

一项前瞻性、多中心观察性研究于 2012 年 1 月至 4 月进行。

地点

门诊 5-18 岁患者,体温≥37.5°C,且根据免疫层析法诊断为流感。

样本

ZN 治疗的 338 例患者和 LO 治疗的 314 例患者进行比较。

主要观察指标

评估两种 NAI 首剂给药后发热持续时间为主要终点。次要终点为双相热发作。

结果

ZN 组和 LO 组发热持续时间无统计学差异(对数秩检验,P = 0.117)。logistic 回归模型显示,年龄每降低 1 岁,双相热发作次数增加 1.19 倍(P = 0.016),LO 治疗组的双相热发作次数是 ZN 治疗组的 5.80 倍(P < 0.001)。

结论

虽然 LO 组的发热持续时间与 ZN 组相当,但年龄较小的儿童和 LO 组的双相热发作更频繁。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4292/4186462/c9c27a8051a8/irv0008-0151-f1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验