Department of Neurology, School of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama; Birmingham Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Birmingham, Alabama.
Department of Neurology, School of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama; Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama; Health Services and Outcomes Research Center for Outcome and Effectiveness Research and Education (COERE), University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama; Center for Excellence in Comparative Effectiveness Research for Eliminating Disparities, Minority Health and Health Disparities Research Center, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama.
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2014 May-Jun;23(5):855-60. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2013.07.019. Epub 2013 Aug 15.
Intravenous (IV) tissue plasminogen activator remains the only approved therapy for acute ischemic stroke (AIS) in the United States; however, less than 10% of patients receive treatment. This is partially because of the large number of contraindications, narrow treatment window, and physician reluctance to deviate from these criteria.
We retrospectively analyzed consecutive patients who received IV thrombolysis at our stroke center for National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS) protocol violations and rates of symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage (sICH). Other outcome variables included systemic hemorrhage, modified Rankin Scale at discharge, and discharge disposition.
A total of 212 patients were identified in our stroke registry between 2009 and 2011 and included in the analysis. Protocol violations occurred in 76 patients (36%). The most common violations were thrombolysis beyond 3 hours (26%), aggressive blood pressure management (15%), elevated prothrombin time (PT) or partial thromboplastin time (PTT) (6.6%), minor or resolving deficits (4.2%), unclear time of onset (3.9%), and stroke within 3 months (3%). There were no significant differences in any of the safety outcomes or discharge disposition between patients with or without protocol violations. Controlling for age, National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale on admission, and glucose on admission, there was no significant increase in sICH (odds ratio: 3.8; 95% confidence interval: .37-38.72) in the patients who had protocol violations.
Despite more than one third of patients receiving thrombolysis with protocol violations, overall rates of hemorrhage remained low and did not differ from those who did not have violations. Our data support the need to expand access to thrombolysis in AIS patients.
在美国,静脉(IV)组织型纤溶酶原激活剂仍然是急性缺血性脑卒中(AIS)唯一批准的治疗方法;然而,只有不到 10%的患者接受了治疗。这在一定程度上是由于存在大量禁忌症、治疗窗口狭窄以及医生不愿意偏离这些标准。
我们回顾性分析了在我们的卒中中心按照国立神经疾病与卒中研究所(NINDS)方案接受 IV 溶栓治疗的连续患者,并评估了其发生症状性颅内出血(sICH)的比例和违反方案的比例。其他结局变量包括全身性出血、出院时改良 Rankin 量表评分和出院去向。
在我们的卒中登记处,2009 年至 2011 年期间共确定了 212 例患者,并纳入了分析。76 例(36%)患者违反了方案。最常见的违规行为是溶栓时间超过 3 小时(26%)、积极的血压管理(15%)、凝血酶原时间(PT)或部分凝血活酶时间(PTT)升高(6.6%)、轻微或正在改善的缺陷(4.2%)、发病时间不明确(3.9%)和 3 个月内发生的卒中(3%)。有或没有违反方案的患者在任何安全性结局或出院去向方面均无显著差异。在校正年龄、入院时的国立卫生研究院卒中量表评分和入院时的血糖水平后,违反方案的患者发生 sICH 的风险无显著增加(比值比:3.8;95%置信区间:.37-38.72)。
尽管超过三分之一的患者接受了违反方案的溶栓治疗,但总体出血率仍然较低,与未违反方案的患者无差异。我们的数据支持在 AIS 患者中扩大溶栓治疗的应用。