Lee Seung Yeol, Min Eungi, Bae Jaekeon, Chung Chin Youb, Lee Kyoung Min, Kwon Soon-Sun, Park Moon Seok, Lee Kisung
*Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Kyungki, Korea †Department of Radiologic Science, College of Health Science, Korea University, Seoul, Korea; and ‡Biomedical Research Institute, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Kyungki, Korea.
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2013 Nov 15;38(24):2108-12. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3182a8270d.
Measurement of radiation dose from C-arm fluoroscopy during a simulated intraoperative use in spine surgery.
To assess how the radiation dose is affected by changes in the types of thyroid shields used and by the arrangements or ways in which they are worn during the intraoperative use of C-arm fluoroscopy.
Although the danger to the thyroid from exposure to radiation is well known, there are no guidelines for the proper use of thyroid shields.
Two photoluminescence dosimeters were used to measure the dose of scattered radiation arriving at the location of the thyroid in a whole-body phantom in the position of the surgeon. On an operating table beside this setup was an anthropomorphic chest phantom representing a patient for which treatment with C-arm fluoroscopy was simulated. Radiation doses were measured using 3 different arrangements of the thyroid shield: worn tightly, worn loosely, and worn loosely with a bismuth masking reagent. The same tests were performed using 2 kinds of thyroid shield: lead and lead-equivalent.
For the lead-shield group, radiation doses were measured in 3 arrangements; worn tightly, worn loosely, and worn loosely with a bismuth masking reagent, for which the results were 1.91 ± 0.13, 2.35 ± 0.22, and 1.86 ± 0.13 μSv/min, respectively. Wearing the shield tight against the throat and wearing it loose with a bismuth masking reagent led to lower radiation exposure levels than by simply wearing the shield loosely (P ≤ 0.001). For the lead-equivalent shield group, doses were measured for the same 3 arrangements, for which the results were 1.79 ± 0.12, 1.82 ± 0.11, and 1.74 ± 0.12 μSv/min. Lower scattered radiation doses were delivered to the thyroid in the lead-equivalent thyroid shield group compared with the lead thyroid shield group (P ≤ 0.001). The unshielded thyroid group received a radiation dose of 16.32 ± 0.48 μSv/min.
The use of some form of thyroid shield is essential during the use of C-arm fluoroscopy. It was found that the best way to reduce scattered radiation exposure to the thyroid was wearing the thyroid shield tightly or wearing it loosely in combination with a bismuth masking reagent.
在脊柱手术的模拟术中使用过程中测量C形臂荧光透视的辐射剂量。
评估在术中使用C形臂荧光透视时,所使用的甲状腺防护屏类型的变化以及佩戴防护屏的方式或方法对辐射剂量的影响。
尽管甲状腺暴露于辐射的危险众所周知,但对于甲状腺防护屏的正确使用尚无指南。
使用两个光致发光剂量计测量到达处于外科医生位置的全身模型中甲状腺位置的散射辐射剂量。在该装置旁边的手术台上有一个模拟患者的拟人化胸部模型,对其进行C形臂荧光透视治疗模拟。使用3种不同的甲状腺防护屏佩戴方式测量辐射剂量:紧密佩戴、宽松佩戴以及宽松佩戴并使用铋屏蔽试剂。使用两种甲状腺防护屏进行相同测试:铅质和等效铅质。
对于铅质防护屏组,测量了3种佩戴方式下的辐射剂量;紧密佩戴、宽松佩戴以及宽松佩戴并使用铋屏蔽试剂,结果分别为1.91±0.13、2.35±0.22和1.86±0.13μSv/分钟。将防护屏紧贴喉咙佩戴以及宽松佩戴并使用铋屏蔽试剂导致的辐射暴露水平低于单纯宽松佩戴防护屏(P≤0.001)。对于等效铅质防护屏组,测量了相同3种佩戴方式下的剂量,结果分别为1.79±0.12、1.82±0.11和1.74±0.12μSv/分钟。与铅质甲状腺防护屏组相比,等效铅质甲状腺防护屏组给予甲状腺的散射辐射剂量更低(P≤0.001)。未防护的甲状腺组接受的辐射剂量为16.32±0.48μSv/分钟。
在使用C形臂荧光透视期间,使用某种形式的甲状腺防护屏至关重要。发现减少甲状腺散射辐射暴露的最佳方法是紧密佩戴甲状腺防护屏或宽松佩戴并结合铋屏蔽试剂。
2级。