Department of Clinical Science, Institute of Tropical Medicine, Nationalestraat 155, 2000 Antwerp, Belgium.
J Virol Methods. 2013 Dec;194(1-2):46-51. doi: 10.1016/j.jviromet.2013.08.004. Epub 2013 Aug 19.
There is need for more evaluations of non-invasive tests in order to broaden the reach of testing programs and to perform large scale epidemiological studies. In this study, three different human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) enzyme linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs) and one line immunoassay were evaluated to detect HIV antibodies in oral fluid samples. Specimens were collected, after informed consent was obtained, with the Oracol (MMD, Worcester, England) device. A total IgG quantitation test was performed to demonstrate the quality of the sample. Assessment of a modified protocol of the Vironostika HIV Ag/Ab, Enzygnost Anti-HIV 1/2 Plus Genscreen HIV-1/2 Version 2 and a line immune confirmatory assay the INNO-LIA HIV I/II score was done, using oral fluid specimens of 325 HIV positive and negative individuals. For the ELISAs, the addition of an extra internal oral fluid control was evaluated as well as different cut-offs, time between sampling and testing and the effect of drinking water just before sampling. Finally, the confirmatory test and some testing algorithms and combination of tests were discussed. The results obtained from the oral fluid specimens were compared with the gold standard on paired serum specimens. Firstly, there was no significant difference observed between the use of the kit controls and the oral fluid controls. New protocols and calculation of cut-offs were defined for two of the three ELISAs. High sensitivities and specificities were obtained with all three ELISAs without any statistical difference between the three tests. Secondly, no statistically significant difference was observed when samples were stored for different time periods between sampling and testing, meaning that a period of seven days at room temperature before testing is still acceptable. Thirdly, drinking water before sample collection did not interfere with the testing, although lower optical densities were observed. None of the positive samples were missed. In addition, the line immunoassay INNO-LIA HIV I/II score test is a promising test for confirmation of reactive oral fluid specimen, but more samples need to be validated in order to adapt the interpretation rules specifically for oral fluid specimens. Different choices/algorithms adapted for the purpose of testing can be proposed. In conclusion, it can be said that the commercial ELISAs with adapted protocol and cut-off values are suitable tools for making HIV test performance accessible to people. With this non-invasive sampling method, more eligible individuals can and will be selected for further HIV test on blood.
为了扩大检测范围并进行大规模的流行病学研究,需要对非侵入性检测进行更多评估。在这项研究中,评估了三种不同的人类免疫缺陷病毒(HIV)酶联免疫吸附测定(ELISA)和一种线免疫分析,以检测口腔液样本中的 HIV 抗体。在获得知情同意后,使用 Oracol(MMD,伍斯特,英国)设备收集标本。进行总 IgG 定量测试以证明样品的质量。评估了 Vironostika HIV Ag/Ab、Enzygnost Anti-HIV 1/2 Plus Genscreen HIV-1/2 Version 2 的改良方案和线免疫确证分析 INNO-LIA HIV I/II 评分,使用了 325 名 HIV 阳性和阴性个体的口腔液标本。对于 ELISA,评估了添加额外的内部口腔液对照以及不同的截止值、采样和测试之间的时间以及在采样前饮用白开水的效果。最后,讨论了确证测试和一些测试算法以及测试组合。将从口腔液标本中获得的结果与配对血清标本的金标准进行比较。首先,试剂盒对照和口腔液对照的使用之间没有观察到显著差异。为其中两种 ELISA 定义了新的方案和截止值计算。所有三种 ELISA 的灵敏度和特异性都很高,三种测试之间没有统计学差异。其次,在采样和测试之间的不同时间段内储存样本时,没有观察到统计学上的显著差异,这意味着在测试前将样本在室温下储存七天仍然是可以接受的。第三,在采样前饮用白开水不会干扰测试,尽管观察到较低的光密度。没有错过任何阳性样本。此外,线免疫分析 INNO-LIA HIV I/II 评分测试是一种有前途的确认反应性口腔液样本的测试,但需要更多的样本进行验证,以便专门为口腔液样本调整解释规则。可以提出针对测试目的的不同选择/算法。总之,可以说经过适应方案和截止值调整的商业 ELISA 是使 HIV 测试易于实施的合适工具。通过这种非侵入性采样方法,可以并且将有更多符合条件的个体被选择进行进一步的血液 HIV 测试。