Suppr超能文献

不向心力衰竭成年患者开具指南推荐药物的原因。

Reasons for not prescribing guideline-recommended medications to adults with heart failure.

机构信息

*Health Services Research and Development Research Enhancement Award Program, San Francisco VA Medical Center †Division of Geriatrics, University of California, San Francisco, CA ‡Department of Psychology, University of Oregon, Eugene, OR §Department of Medicine, Palo Alto VA Health Care System, Stanford University, Stanford, CA ∥Veterans Affairs Office of Research and Development ¶Departments of Psychiatry and Urology, University of California, San Francisco, CA #Comprehensive Access and Delivery Research and Evaluation (CADRE) Center, Iowa City VA Healthcare System **Department of Internal Medicine, University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine, Iowa City, IA.

出版信息

Med Care. 2013 Oct;51(10):901-7. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e3182a3e525.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Little is known about how often contextual factors such as patient preferences and competing priorities impact prescribing of guideline-recommended medications, or about the extent to which these factors are documented in medical records and available to performance measurement systems.

METHODS

Mixed-methods study of 295 veterans aged 50 years and older in 4 VA health care systems who had systolic heart failure and were not prescribed a β-blocker and/or an angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor or angiotensin-receptor blocker. Reasons for nontreatment were identified from clinic notes and from interviews with 62 primary care clinicians caring for these patients. These reasons were classified using a published taxonomy.

RESULTS

Among 295 patients not receiving guideline-recommended drugs for heart failure, chart review identified biomedical reasons for nonprescribing in 42%-58% of patients and contextual reasons in 11%-17%. Clinician interviews identified twice as many reasons for nonprescribing as chart review (mean 1.6 vs. 0.8 reasons per patient, P<0.001). In these interviews, biomedical reasons for nonprescribing were cited in 50%-70% of patients, and contextual reasons in 64%-70%. The most common contextual reasons were comanagement with other clinicians (32%-35% of patients), patient preferences and nonadherence (15%-24%), and clinician belief that the medication is not indicated in the patient (12%-20%).

CONCLUSIONS

Contextual reasons for not prescribing angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor / angiotensin-receptor blockers and β-blockers are present in two thirds of patients with heart failure who did not receive these medications, yet are poorly documented in medical records. The structure of medical records should be improved to facilitate documentation of contextual reasons for not providing guideline-recommended care.

摘要

背景

对于患者偏好和竞争优先级等情境因素影响指南推荐药物处方的频率,以及这些因素在医疗记录中记录的程度及其在绩效衡量系统中的可用性,我们知之甚少。

方法

对 4 个 VA 医疗保健系统中 295 名年龄在 50 岁及以上的患有收缩性心力衰竭且未开β受体阻滞剂和/或血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂或血管紧张素受体阻滞剂的退伍军人进行了一项混合方法研究。从临床记录和对 62 名照顾这些患者的初级保健临床医生的访谈中确定了未治疗的原因。这些原因使用已发表的分类法进行分类。

结果

在 295 名未接受心力衰竭指南推荐药物治疗的患者中,通过病历回顾确定了 42%-58%的患者存在非处方用药的生物医学原因和 11%-17%的患者存在情境原因。临床医生访谈确定了两倍于病历回顾的非处方用药原因(每位患者平均 1.6 个与 0.8 个原因,P<0.001)。在这些访谈中,50%-70%的患者提到了非处方用药的生物医学原因,64%-70%的患者提到了情境原因。最常见的情境原因是与其他临床医生共同管理(32%-35%的患者)、患者偏好和不依从(15%-24%)以及临床医生认为该药物不适用于该患者(12%-20%)。

结论

在未接受这些药物治疗的心力衰竭患者中,有三分之二的患者存在不处方血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂/血管紧张素受体阻滞剂和β受体阻滞剂的情境原因,但这些原因在医疗记录中记录不佳。医疗记录的结构应加以改进,以方便记录未提供指南推荐的护理的情境原因。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

5
The long-term effect of premier pay for performance on patient outcomes.主要绩效薪酬对患者结局的长期影响。
N Engl J Med. 2012 Apr 26;366(17):1606-15. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa1112351. Epub 2012 Mar 28.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验