Suppr超能文献

比较传统梅毒非密螺旋体试验在梅毒和非梅毒血清样本上的表现。

Comparing the performance of traditional non-treponemal tests on syphilis and non-syphilis serum samples.

作者信息

Gu Wei-Ming, Yang Yang, Wang Qing-zhong, Pan Bai-shen, Guo Wei, Wu Lei, Hu Wei-zhong, Yang Sheng, Song Bin-bin, Zhang Chun-yan

机构信息

Shanghai Skin Disease Hospital, Shanghai, China.

出版信息

Int J STD AIDS. 2013 Dec;24(12):919-25. doi: 10.1177/0956462413491399. Epub 2013 Jul 19.

Abstract

The goal of the present study was to determine the performance of two traditional non-treponemal tests for syphilis. Syphilis sera (n = 209) included different stages of disease, and control sera (n = 247) were from patients with tumours, leprosy, systemic lupus erythematosus, hepatitis, pregnant women and healthy individuals. Treponema pallidum ELISA, Treponema pallidum particle agglutination and rapid treponema-specific tests were used as gold standards. Rapid plasma reagin or toluidine red unheated serum test had a sensitivity and specificity of over 95%. False-negative reactions of rapid plasma reagin and toluidine red unheated serum test were observed mainly in primary and latent syphilis cases, and false-positive reactions were present in systemic lupus erythematosus, hepatitis-infected patients. Overall, both non-treponemal tests had high sensitivities and specificities making the assays attractive as screening tests for syphilis. When examined on WHO reference serum samples and based on lower limits of detection, non-treponemal tests were less sensitive than treponema-specific tests.

摘要

本研究的目的是确定两种传统梅毒非梅毒螺旋体检测方法的性能。梅毒血清(n = 209)包括疾病的不同阶段,对照血清(n = 247)来自肿瘤、麻风、系统性红斑狼疮、肝炎患者、孕妇和健康个体。梅毒螺旋体酶联免疫吸附测定、梅毒螺旋体颗粒凝集试验和快速梅毒螺旋体特异性试验用作金标准。快速血浆反应素试验或甲苯胺红不加热血清试验的敏感性和特异性均超过95%。快速血浆反应素试验和甲苯胺红不加热血清试验的假阴性反应主要见于一期和潜伏梅毒病例,假阳性反应见于系统性红斑狼疮、肝炎感染患者。总体而言,两种非梅毒螺旋体检测方法均具有较高的敏感性和特异性,使其作为梅毒筛查试验具有吸引力。在世界卫生组织参考血清样本上进行检测并基于检测下限进行检查时,非梅毒螺旋体检测方法的敏感性低于梅毒螺旋体特异性检测方法。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验