Tomuzia Katharina, Menrath Andrea, Frentzel Hendrik, Filter Matthias, Weiser Armin A, Bräunig Juliane, Buschulte Anja, Appel Bernd
Dr. Katharina Tomuzia, Dr. Andrea Menrath, Hendrik Frentzel, Matthias Filter, Dr. Armin A. Weiser, and Dr. Anja Buschulte are Research Scientists; Dr. Juliane Bräunig is Head of Unit Microbial Toxins; and Prof. Bernd Appel is Head of the department; all in the Department Biological Safety, Federal Institute for Risk Assessment (BfR), Berlin, Germany .
Biosecur Bioterror. 2013 Sep;11 Suppl 1:S3-16. doi: 10.1089/bsp.2012.0070.
Various systems for prioritizing biological agents with respect to their applicability as biological weapons are available, ranging from qualitative to (semi)quantitative approaches. This research aimed at generating a generic risk ranking system applicable to human and animal pathogenic agents based on scientific information. Criteria were evaluated and clustered to create a criteria list. Considering availability of data, a number of 28 criteria separated by content were identified that can be classified in 11 thematic areas or categories. Relevant categories contributing to probability were historical aspects, accessibility, production efforts, and possible paths for dispersion. Categories associated with impact are dealing with containment measures, availability of diagnostics, preventive and treatment measures in human and animal populations, impact on society, human and veterinary public health, and economic and ecological consequences. To allow data-based scoring, each criterion was described by at least 1 measure that allows the assignment of values. These values constitute quantities, ranges, or facts that are as explicit and precise as possible. The consideration of minimum and maximum values that can occur due to natural variations and that are often described in the literature led to the development of minimum and maximum criteria and consequently category scores. Missing or incomplete data, and uncertainty resulting therefrom, were integrated into the scheme via a cautious (but not overcautious) approach. The visualization technique that was used allows the description and illustration of uncertainty on the level of probability and impact. The developed risk ranking system was evaluated by assessing the risk originating from the bioterrorism threat of the animal pathogen bluetongue virus, the human pathogen Enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli O157:H7, the zoonotic Bacillus anthracis, and Botulinum neurotoxin.
有各种用于根据生物制剂作为生物武器的适用性对其进行优先级排序的系统,范围从定性方法到(半)定量方法。本研究旨在基于科学信息生成一个适用于人类和动物病原体的通用风险排名系统。对标准进行了评估和聚类以创建一个标准列表。考虑到数据的可用性,确定了按内容划分的28条标准,这些标准可分为11个主题领域或类别。对概率有贡献的相关类别包括历史方面、可及性、生产难度以及可能的传播途径。与影响相关的类别涉及遏制措施、诊断方法的可用性、人类和动物群体中的预防和治疗措施、对社会的影响、人类和兽医公共卫生以及经济和生态后果。为了进行基于数据的评分,每个标准至少由一种允许赋值的度量来描述。这些值构成尽可能明确和精确的数量、范围或事实。考虑到由于自然变异可能出现的最小值和最大值(这些值在文献中经常有描述),从而制定了最小和最大标准以及相应的类别分数。通过谨慎(但不过度谨慎)的方法将缺失或不完整的数据以及由此产生的不确定性纳入该方案。所使用的可视化技术允许在概率和影响层面描述和说明不确定性。通过评估动物病原体蓝舌病毒、人类病原体肠出血性大肠杆菌O157:H7、人畜共患病炭疽杆菌和肉毒杆菌神经毒素的生物恐怖主义威胁所产生的风险,对所开发的风险排名系统进行了评估。