Yu Yang, Zhang Fan, Gao Ming-Xin, Li Hai-Tao, Li Jing-Xing, Song Wei, Huang Xin-Sheng, Gu Cheng-Xiong
Department of Cardiac Surgery, Beijing An Zhen Hospital of Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2013 Dec;17(6):938-43. doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivt398. Epub 2013 Sep 1.
Intraoperative transit time flow measurement (TTFM) is widely used to assess anastomotic quality in coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). However, in sequential vein grafting, the flow characteristics collected by the conventional TTFM method are usually associated with total graft flow and might not accurately indicate the quality of every distal anastomosis in a sequential graft. The purpose of our study was to examine a new TTFM method that could assess the quality of each distal anastomosis in a sequential graft more reliably than the conventional TTFM approach.
Two TTFM methods were tested in 84 patients who underwent sequential saphenous off-pump CABG in Beijing An Zhen Hospital between April and August 2012. In the conventional TTFM method, normal blood flow in the sequential graft was maintained during the measurement, and the flow probe was placed a few centimetres above the anastomosis to be evaluated. In the new method, blood flow in the sequential graft was temporarily reduced during the measurement by placing an atraumatic bulldog clamp at the graft a few centimetres distal to the anastomosis to be evaluated, while the position of the flow probe remained the same as in the conventional method. This new TTFM method was named the flow reduction TTFM. Graft flow parameters measured by both methods were compared.
Compared with the conventional TTFM, the flow reduction TTFM resulted in significantly lower mean graft blood flow (P < 0.05); in contrast, yielded significantly higher pulsatility index (P < 0.05). Diastolic filling was not significantly different between the two methods and was >50% in both cases. Interestingly, the flow reduction TTFM identified two defective middle distal anastomoses that the conventional TTFM failed to detect. Graft flows near the defective distal anastomoses were improved substantially after revision.
In this study, we found that temporary reduction of graft flow during TTFM seemed to enhance the sensitivity of TTFM to less-than-critical anastomotic defects in a sequential graft and to improve the overall accuracy of the intraoperative assessment of anastomotic quality in sequential vein grafting.
术中通过时间流量测量(TTFM)广泛用于评估冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)中的吻合口质量。然而,在序贯静脉移植中,传统TTFM方法收集的血流特征通常与总移植血流相关,可能无法准确指示序贯移植中每个远端吻合口的质量。本研究的目的是检验一种新的TTFM方法,该方法比传统TTFM方法能更可靠地评估序贯移植中每个远端吻合口的质量。
2012年4月至8月间,在北京安贞医院对84例行序贯非体外循环下大隐静脉CABG的患者测试了两种TTFM方法。在传统TTFM方法中,测量期间维持序贯移植中的正常血流,将流量探头置于待评估吻合口上方几厘米处。在新方法中,通过在待评估吻合口远端几厘米处的移植血管上放置无损伤血管夹,在测量期间暂时减少序贯移植中的血流,而流量探头的位置与传统方法相同。这种新的TTFM方法被命名为血流减少TTFM。比较两种方法测量的移植血流参数。
与传统TTFM相比,血流减少TTFM导致平均移植血流显著降低(P<0.05);相反,搏动指数显著升高(P<0.05)。两种方法之间舒张期充盈无显著差异,两种情况下均>50%。有趣的是,血流减少TTFM发现了两个传统TTFM未能检测到的有缺陷的中间远端吻合口。修复后,有缺陷远端吻合口附近的移植血流显著改善。
在本研究中,我们发现TTFM期间暂时减少移植血流似乎可提高TTFM对序贯移植中小于临界吻合口缺陷的敏感性,并提高序贯静脉移植术中吻合口质量评估的总体准确性。