Boey W K, Lai F O
Department of Anaesthesia, National University of Singapore.
Anaesthesia. 1990 Aug;45(8):623-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.1990.tb14383.x.
Propofol and thiopentone were compared as anaesthetic agents for electroconvulsive therapy in 31 patients on four occasions in a repeated measure crossover study. Discomfort on injection was significantly more common with propofol (51.6% of anaesthetics) compared to thiopentone (1.6% of anaesthetics). The duration of seizure was shorter with propofol in both treatments but there was significant drug-time interaction. Propofol gave a milder tonus and clonus during seizure when both treatments were considered together. The increase in systolic and diastolic arterial pressures and heart rate after treatment were significantly higher with thiopentone. Apnoea was significantly longer with propofol. The times to sitting up unaided and opening the eyes on command were the same for both drugs. The ability to walk 10 m 20 minutes after anaesthesia was significantly better with propofol (p less than 0.0001).
在一项重复测量交叉研究中,对31例患者在四个不同场合使用丙泊酚和硫喷妥钠作为电惊厥治疗的麻醉剂进行了比较。与硫喷妥钠(占麻醉剂的1.6%)相比,丙泊酚注射时的不适感明显更常见(占麻醉剂的51.6%)。在两种治疗中,丙泊酚使癫痫发作持续时间更短,但存在显著的药物-时间相互作用。综合两种治疗来看,丙泊酚在癫痫发作时产生的肌张力和阵挛较轻。硫喷妥钠治疗后收缩压和舒张压以及心率的升高明显更高。丙泊酚导致的呼吸暂停明显更长。两种药物自主坐起和按指令睁眼的时间相同。麻醉后20分钟能够行走10米的能力,丙泊酚明显更好(p小于0.0001)。