Suppr超能文献

手部对物体抓握的选择受近期运动经历的影响。

Hand selection for object grasping is influenced by recent motor history.

作者信息

Valyear Kenneth F, Frey Scott H

机构信息

Department of Psychological Sciences, University of Missouri, Brain Imaging Center, 206 Melvin H. Marx Building, Columbia, MO, 65211, USA,

出版信息

Psychon Bull Rev. 2014 Apr;21(2):566-73. doi: 10.3758/s13423-013-0504-2.

Abstract

Action selection processes such as those that underlie decisions about which hand to use for upcoming actions are fundamental to adaptive motor behavior. Previous research has shown that people grasp objects in ways that reflect anticipated task demands, as well as recent movement experience. However, very few studies have addressed the possible influence of recent motor history on hand selection. In the present study, participants grasped and placed objects using either their left or right hand. The results showed shorter response times to initiate successive actions when hand was repeated, even when those actions involved distinct grasp postures and object placement movements to distinct locations. Conversely, no such planning advantage was observed for repeated grasps for successive actions made with opposite hands. The findings are consistent with the idea that choices about which hand to use in the present are influenced by which hand was used in the recent past. When the same hand can be used for successive actions, planning is made more efficient, presumably because the motor parameters that specify which hand to use can be recalled from recent memory rather than formulated anew. The findings indicate that hand selection is sensitive to recent movement experience and provide novel support for computational efficiency accounts of motor history effects.

摘要

诸如那些构成即将进行的动作选择哪只手的决策基础的动作选择过程,对于适应性运动行为至关重要。先前的研究表明,人们以反映预期任务需求以及近期运动经验的方式抓握物体。然而,很少有研究探讨近期运动经历对用手选择的可能影响。在本研究中,参与者用左手或右手抓握并放置物体。结果显示,当重复使用同一只手时,发起连续动作的反应时间更短,即使这些动作涉及不同的抓握姿势以及将物体放置到不同位置的动作。相反,对于用相反的手进行连续动作的重复抓握,未观察到这种计划优势。这些发现与以下观点一致,即当下关于使用哪只手的选择会受到近期使用过哪只手的影响。当同一只手可用于连续动作时,计划会更高效,大概是因为指定使用哪只手的运动参数可以从近期记忆中调取,而无需重新制定。这些发现表明用手选择对近期运动经验敏感,并为运动历史效应的计算效率解释提供了新的支持。

相似文献

1
Hand selection for object grasping is influenced by recent motor history.
Psychon Bull Rev. 2014 Apr;21(2):566-73. doi: 10.3758/s13423-013-0504-2.
2
Repetition effects in action planning reflect effector- but not hemisphere-specific coding.
J Neurophysiol. 2021 Dec 1;126(6):2001-2013. doi: 10.1152/jn.00326.2021. Epub 2021 Nov 17.
3
Human posterior parietal cortex mediates hand-specific planning.
Neuroimage. 2015 Jul 1;114:226-38. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.03.058. Epub 2015 Apr 2.
4
Programming of left hand exploits task set but that of right hand depends on recent history.
Exp Brain Res. 2017 Jul;235(7):2215-2224. doi: 10.1007/s00221-017-4964-x. Epub 2017 Apr 27.
5
An investigation into manual asymmetries in grasp behavior and kinematics during an object manipulation task.
Exp Brain Res. 2011 Nov;215(1):65-75. doi: 10.1007/s00221-011-2872-z. Epub 2011 Sep 22.
6
Individual differences in motor planning during a multi-segment object manipulation task.
Exp Brain Res. 2012 Oct;222(1-2):125-36. doi: 10.1007/s00221-012-3203-8. Epub 2012 Aug 11.
8
Shared right-hemispheric representations of sensorimotor goals in dynamic task environments.
Exp Brain Res. 2019 Apr;237(4):977-987. doi: 10.1007/s00221-019-05478-2. Epub 2019 Jan 29.
9
Symmetries in action: on the interactive nature of planning constraints for bimanual object manipulation.
Exp Brain Res. 2014 Dec;232(12):3919-27. doi: 10.1007/s00221-014-4077-8. Epub 2014 Aug 27.
10
Spatiotemporal Distribution of Location and Object Effects in Primary Motor Cortex Neurons during Reach-to-Grasp.
J Neurosci. 2016 Oct 12;36(41):10640-10653. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1716-16.2016.

引用本文的文献

1
Effector selection precedes movement specification: evidence from repetition effects in motor planning.
Exp Brain Res. 2025 Feb 20;243(3):71. doi: 10.1007/s00221-025-07022-x.
2
Active reinforcement learning versus action bias and hysteresis: control with a mixture of experts and nonexperts.
PLoS Comput Biol. 2024 Mar 29;20(3):e1011950. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1011950. eCollection 2024 Mar.
3
Hysteresis in motor and language production.
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2023 Mar;76(3):511-527. doi: 10.1177/17470218221094568. Epub 2022 May 18.
4
Repetition effects in action planning reflect effector- but not hemisphere-specific coding.
J Neurophysiol. 2021 Dec 1;126(6):2001-2013. doi: 10.1152/jn.00326.2021. Epub 2021 Nov 17.
5
Is Language Production Planning Emergent From Action Planning? A Preliminary Investigation.
Front Psychol. 2020 Jun 5;11:1193. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01193. eCollection 2020.
6
Now and then: Hand choice is influenced by recent action history.
Psychon Bull Rev. 2019 Feb;26(1):305-314. doi: 10.3758/s13423-018-1510-1.
7
Human posterior parietal cortex mediates hand-specific planning.
Neuroimage. 2015 Jul 1;114:226-38. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.03.058. Epub 2015 Apr 2.
8
Two routes to the same action: an action repetition priming study.
J Mot Behav. 2015;47(2):142-52. doi: 10.1080/00222895.2014.961891. Epub 2014 Oct 28.

本文引用的文献

1
Cognition, action, and object manipulation.
Psychol Bull. 2012 Sep;138(5):924-46. doi: 10.1037/a0027839. Epub 2012 Mar 26.
2
Repetition effects in grasping.
Can J Exp Psychol. 2012 Mar;66(1):1-17. doi: 10.1037/a0026192. Epub 2011 Dec 12.
3
Prospective and retrospective effects in human motor control: planning grasps for object rotation and translation.
Psychol Res. 2011 Jul;75(4):341-9. doi: 10.1007/s00426-010-0311-6. Epub 2010 Oct 13.
4
Bimanual grasp planning reflects changing rather than fixed constraint dominance.
Exp Brain Res. 2010 Sep;205(3):351-62. doi: 10.1007/s00221-010-2368-2. Epub 2010 Jul 24.
5
Hysteresis effects in a motor task with cotton-top tamarins (Sanguinus oedipus).
J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 2009 Jul;35(3):427-33. doi: 10.1037/a0013964.
6
Goal-related planning constraints in bimanual grasping and placing of objects.
Exp Brain Res. 2008 Jul;188(4):541-50. doi: 10.1007/s00221-008-1387-8. Epub 2008 Apr 29.
8
Orienting the finger opposition space during prehension movements.
J Mot Behav. 1994 Jun;26(2):178-86. doi: 10.1080/00222895.1994.9941672.
9
No evidence for visuomotor priming in a visually guided action task.
Neuropsychologia. 2005;43(2):216-26. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2004.11.008. Epub 2005 Jan 7.
10
Timecourse of preshaping for functional responses to objects.
J Mot Behav. 1989 Sep;21(3):307-16. doi: 10.1080/00222895.1989.10735484.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验