Scott & White Clinic, Texas A&M Health Science Center, Temple, TX.
Surgery. 2013 Oct;154(4):704-11; discussion 711-3. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2013.06.039. Epub 2013 Sep 3.
Despite widespread use of intraoperative nerve monitoring (IONM) as an adjunct to visual identification of the recurrent laryngeal nerve (RLN), published studies have shown little or no benefit. No long-term studies exist detailing the effect of experience gained from IONM on the rate of RLN injury. The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of IONM feedback on surgical outcomes over time at a single institution.
We conducted retrospective analysis of prospectively gathered data for 1,936 patients including 3,435 nerves at risk between March 2004 and September 2011. Each RLN was analyzed for the specific, unilateral operative procedure that placed the nerve at risk of injury. The primary outcome measures included temporary vocal cord palsy and permanent vocal cord paralysis or paresis as determined by intraoperative loss of RLN function and postoperative laryngoscopy. Additional measures included instances where IONM assisted the surgeon's localization of the RLN.
Of the 3,435 nerves at risk, 105 (3.06%) were injured, 4 had permanent paralysis (0.12%), and 7 had paresis (0.20%). Over time, a decrease in RLN injury was seen per successive operative year for thyroid lobectomy with paratracheal lymph node dissection with or without parathyroidectomy (odds ratio, 0.98; 95% confidence interval, 0.97-1.00; P = .04); the rate of nerve injury stabilized after 20 months of continued use of nerve monitoring. IONM particularly assisted the surgeon with identification of 108 nerves at risk (3.14%) with aberrant anatomy, and with identification of 236 nerves at risk (6.87%) during difficult dissections.
With experience, routine use of IONM during thyroid and parathyroid operations significantly decreased the incidence of injury to the RLN for thyroid lobectomy with paratracheal lymph node dissection and provided useful assistance with RLN identification for 10% of nerves at risk.
尽管术中神经监测(IONM)作为识别喉返神经(RLN)的辅助手段被广泛应用,但已发表的研究表明其益处甚微或不存在。目前尚无长期研究详细说明从 IONM 中获得的经验对 RLN 损伤率的影响。本研究旨在评估单一机构内 IONM 反馈对手术结果的长期影响。
我们对 2004 年 3 月至 2011 年 9 月期间前瞻性收集的数据进行了回顾性分析,共纳入 1936 例患者,共涉及 3435 条风险神经。每条 RLN 均针对存在神经损伤风险的特定单侧手术程序进行分析。主要观察指标包括术中 RLN 功能丧失和术后喉镜检查确定的暂时性声带麻痹和永久性声带麻痹或瘫痪。其他观察指标包括 IONM 辅助外科医生定位 RLN 的情况。
在 3435 条风险神经中,有 105 条(3.06%)受损,4 条出现永久性瘫痪(0.12%),7 条出现瘫痪(0.20%)。随着时间的推移,甲状腺叶切除术伴或不伴甲状旁腺切除术的 RLN 损伤率逐年下降,其中包括气管旁淋巴结清扫术(比值比,0.98;95%置信区间,0.97-1.00;P =.04);在连续使用神经监测 20 个月后,神经损伤的发生率趋于稳定。IONM 特别有助于外科医生识别 108 条具有异常解剖结构的风险神经(3.14%),并在 236 条(6.87%)困难解剖神经中识别。
随着经验的积累,在甲状腺和甲状旁腺手术中常规使用 IONM 显著降低了甲状腺叶切除术伴气管旁淋巴结清扫术的 RLN 损伤发生率,并且对 10%的风险神经的 RLN 识别提供了有用的辅助。