• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

比较可压金属陶瓷定制种植体基台与商业化 CAD/CAM 氧化锆种植体基台的抗折能力。

Comparison of fracture resistance of pressable metal ceramic custom implant abutment with a commercially fabricated CAD/CAM zirconia implant abutment.

机构信息

Private practice, Athens, Greece.

出版信息

J Prosthet Dent. 2013 Nov;110(5):389-96. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2013.06.004. Epub 2013 Sep 5.

DOI:10.1016/j.prosdent.2013.06.004
PMID:24011801
Abstract

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM

The predictable nature of the hot pressing ceramic technique has several applications, but no study was identified that evaluated its application to the fabrication of custom implant abutments.

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to compare the fracture resistance of an experimentally designed pressable metal ceramic custom implant abutment (PR) with that of a duplicate zirconia abutment (ZR).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Two groups of narrow platform (NP) (Nobel Replace) implant abutment specimens were fabricated (n=10). The experimental abutment (PR) had a metal substructure cast with ceramic alloy (Lodestar) and veneered with leucite pressable glass ceramic (InLine PoM). Each PR abutment was individually scanned and 10 duplicate CAD/CAM ZR abutments were fabricated for the control group. Ceramic crowns (n=20) with the average dimensions of a human lateral incisor were pressed with lithium disilicate glass ceramic (IPS e.max Press) and bonded on the abutments with a resin luting agent (Multilink Automix). The specimens were subjected to thermocycling, cyclic loading, and finally static loading to failure with a computer-controlled Universal Testing Machine. An independent t test (1 sided) determined whether the mean values of the fracture load differed significantly (α=.05) between the 2 groups.

RESULTS

No specimen failed during cyclic loading. Upon static loading, the mean (SD) load to failure was significantly higher for the PR group (525.89 [143.547] N) than for the ZR group (413.70 [35.515] N) for internal connection narrow platform bone-level implants (P=.025). Failure was initiated at the screw and internal connection level for both groups.

CONCLUSIONS

It is possible to fabricate PR abutments that are stronger than ZR abutments for Nobel Biocare internal connection NP bone-level implants. The screw and the internal connection are the weak links for both groups.

摘要

问题陈述

热压陶瓷技术具有多种可预测的应用,但没有发现研究评估其在定制种植体基台制造中的应用。

目的

本研究旨在比较实验设计的可压金属陶瓷定制种植体基台(PR)与复制氧化锆基台(ZR)的抗断裂能力。

材料和方法

制作了两组窄台(NP)(诺贝尔Replace)种植体基台标本(n=10)。实验基台(PR)具有用陶瓷合金(Lodestar)铸造的金属底层结构,并涂覆有透锂长石可压玻璃陶瓷(InLine PoM)。每个 PR 基台均单独扫描,并为对照组制作了 10 个复制 CAD/CAM ZR 基台。用锂硅二硅酸盐玻璃陶瓷(IPS e.max Press)压制具有人类侧切牙平均尺寸的陶瓷冠,并通过树脂粘固剂(Multilink Automix)将其粘接到基台上。将标本进行热循环、循环加载,最后用计算机控制的万能试验机进行静态加载至失效。独立 t 检验(单侧)确定两组之间的断裂负荷平均值是否有显著差异(α=.05)。

结果

没有标本在循环加载过程中失效。在静态加载时,PR 组的平均(SD)失效负荷(525.89 [143.547] N)明显高于 ZR 组(413.70 [35.515] N),用于内部连接窄台骨水平种植体(P=.025)。两组的失效均从螺钉和内部连接水平开始。

结论

对于 Nobel Biocare 内部连接 NP 骨水平种植体,可以制造出比 ZR 基台更强的 PR 基台。螺钉和内部连接是两组的薄弱环节。

相似文献

1
Comparison of fracture resistance of pressable metal ceramic custom implant abutment with a commercially fabricated CAD/CAM zirconia implant abutment.比较可压金属陶瓷定制种植体基台与商业化 CAD/CAM 氧化锆种植体基台的抗折能力。
J Prosthet Dent. 2013 Nov;110(5):389-96. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2013.06.004. Epub 2013 Sep 5.
2
Comparison of fracture resistance of pressable metal ceramic custom implant abutments with CAD/CAM commercially fabricated zirconia implant abutments.可压制金属陶瓷定制种植体基台与CAD/CAM商业制造的氧化锆种植体基台的抗折性比较。
J Prosthet Dent. 2009 Apr;101(4):226-30. doi: 10.1016/S0022-3913(09)60043-3.
3
The influence of incisal veneering porcelain thickness of two metal ceramic crown systems on failure resistance after cyclic loading.两种金属烤瓷冠系统切端瓷厚度对循环加载后抗破坏能力的影响。
J Prosthet Dent. 2010 May;103(5):275-82. doi: 10.1016/S0022-3913(10)60058-3.
4
Fracture resistance of titanium and zirconia abutments: an in vitro study.钛和氧化锆基台的抗折能力:一项体外研究。
J Prosthet Dent. 2013 May;109(5):304-12. doi: 10.1016/S0022-3913(13)60306-6.
5
Bending moments of zirconia and titanium implant abutments supporting all-ceramic crowns after aging.老化后支持全瓷冠的氧化锆和钛种植体基台的弯矩
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2014 Jan;25(1):74-81. doi: 10.1111/clr.12192. Epub 2013 Jun 4.
6
In vitro assessment of three types of zirconia implant abutments under static load.体外静态负荷下三种氧化锆种植体基台的评估。
J Prosthet Dent. 2013 Apr;109(4):255-63. doi: 10.1016/S0022-3913(13)60054-2.
7
Fracture Strength of Monolithic All-Ceramic Crowns on Titanium Implant Abutments.钛种植体基台上整体式全瓷冠的断裂强度
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2016 Mar-Apr;31(2):304-9. doi: 10.11607/jomi.4601.
8
Fracture resistance of crowns cemented on titanium and zirconia implant abutments: a comparison of monolithic versus manually veneered all-ceramic systems.钛和氧化锆种植体基台烤瓷冠的抗折裂性能:全瓷单体冠与手工堆塑烤瓷冠的比较。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2012 Nov-Dec;27(6):1448-55.
9
Fracture load of monolithic CAD/CAM lithium disilicate ceramic crowns and veneered zirconia crowns as a posterior implant restoration.整体式 CAD/CAM 二硅酸锂陶瓷冠和饰面氧化锆冠作为后牙种植修复体的 fracture load。
Implant Dent. 2013 Feb;22(1):66-70. doi: 10.1097/ID.0b013e318278a576.
10
Fracture mode during cyclic loading of implant-supported single-tooth restorations.种植体支持的单牙修复体在循环加载下的断裂模式。
J Prosthet Dent. 2012 Aug;108(2):74-83. doi: 10.1016/S0022-3913(12)60110-3.

引用本文的文献

1
Fracture resistance and the mode of failure produced in metal-free crowns cemented onto zirconia abutments in dental implants.无金属烤瓷冠黏固于氧化锆基台的种植体中的抗折能力和失效模式。
PLoS One. 2019 Aug 8;14(8):e0220551. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0220551. eCollection 2019.