Suppr超能文献

虚拟手错觉:冲击和威胁对感知所有权和情感共鸣的影响。

The virtual-hand illusion: effects of impact and threat on perceived ownership and affective resonance.

机构信息

Institute for Psychological Research and Leiden Institute for Brain and Cognition, Leiden University Leiden, Netherlands.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2013 Sep 6;4:604. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00604. eCollection 2013.

Abstract

The rubber hand illusion refers to the observation that participants perceive "body ownership" for a rubber hand if it moves, or is stroked in synchrony with the participant's real (covered) hand. Research indicates that events targeting artificial body parts can trigger affective responses (affective resonance) only with perceived body ownership, while neuroscientific findings suggest affective resonance irrespective of ownership (e.g., when observing other individuals under threat). We hypothesized that this may depend on the severity of the event. We first replicated previous findings that the rubber hand illusion can be extended to virtual hands-the virtual-hand illusion. We then tested whether hand ownership and affective resonance (assessed by galvanic skin conductance) are modulated by the experience of an event that either "impacted" (a ball hitting the hand) or "threatened" (a knife cutting the hand) the virtual hand. Ownership was stronger if the virtual hand moved synchronously with the participant's own hand, but this effect was independent from whether the hand was impacted or threatened. Affective resonance was mediated by ownership however: In the face of mere impact, participants showed more resonance in the synchronous condition (i.e., with perceived ownership) than in the asynchronous condition. In the face of threat, in turn, affective resonance was independent of synchronicity-participants were emotionally involved even if a threat was targeting a hand that they did not perceive as their own. Our findings suggest that perceived body ownership and affective responses to body-related impact or threat can be dissociated and are thus unlikely to represent the same underlying process. We argue that affective reactions to impact are produced in a top-down fashion if the impacted effector is assumed to be part of one's own body, whereas threatening events trigger affective responses more directly in a bottom-up fashion-irrespective of body ownership.

摘要

橡胶手错觉是指这样一种观察结果

如果橡胶手移动,或者与参与者真实(被遮盖的)手同步被触摸,那么参与者会感知到“身体所有权”。研究表明,针对人工身体部位的事件只有在感知到身体所有权的情况下才能引发情感反应(情感共鸣),而神经科学发现表明,即使没有所有权(例如,当观察到其他个体受到威胁时),情感共鸣也会发生。我们假设这可能取决于事件的严重程度。我们首先复制了先前的发现,即橡胶手错觉可以扩展到虚拟手上——虚拟手错觉。然后,我们测试了手的所有权和情感共鸣(通过皮肤电导测量)是否会受到影响,即事件的体验会“撞击”(球撞击手)或“威胁”(刀切割手)虚拟手。如果虚拟手与参与者自己的手同步移动,那么所有权就会更强,但这种效果与手是否受到撞击或威胁无关。然而,情感共鸣是由所有权介导的:面对仅仅是撞击,参与者在同步条件下(即感知到所有权)比在异步条件下表现出更多的共鸣。相反,面对威胁,情感共鸣与同步性无关——即使威胁针对的是参与者没有感知到属于自己的手,他们也会感到情绪上的卷入。我们的发现表明,对身体相关冲击或威胁的感知身体所有权和情感反应可以分离,因此不太可能代表相同的潜在过程。我们认为,如果假设受影响的效应器是自己身体的一部分,那么对冲击的情感反应是自上而下产生的,而威胁事件则是更直接地自下而上触发情感反应——而不考虑身体所有权。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a387/3764400/0772964f46e6/fpsyg-04-00604-g0001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验